﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Labslink Research News</title><link>http://www.labslink.com</link><description>The latest research news from labslink.com.</description><copyright>Copyright 2009 Labslink.com. All rights reserved.</copyright><item><title>Dusting for prints from a fossil fish to understand evolutionary change</title><description>In 370 million-year-old red sandstone deposits in a highway roadcut,  scientists have discovered a new species of armored fish in north  central Pennsylvania. Fossils of armored fishes like this one, a phyllolepid placoderm, are  known for the distinctive ornamentation of ridges on their exterior  plates.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://newsblog.drexel.edu/2013/03/27/dusting-for-prints-from-a-fossil-fish-to-understand-evolutionary-change/" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=9310</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:10:40 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>great tool to find conference and courses</title><description>&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;Hey guys&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;&amp;nbsp;Some people working at the NKI (Netherlands Cancer Institute) have setup a&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;&amp;nbsp;search engine for scientific meetings. check the description and the website&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;as well, if interested...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;
&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;&amp;nbsp;This website, called&amp;nbsp;biomeeter&amp;nbsp;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: #1155cc; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" href="http://www.biomeeter.com/" target="_blank"&gt;www.biomeeter.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;) is really well done as it&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;gives a nice overview of the upcoming meetings organized, and the search can&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;be done by field or keyword, or even by location (as it's always possible to&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;combine business with pleasure ;-)).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;Another great characteristic of&amp;nbsp;Biomeeter&amp;nbsp;is that you can add yourself&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;meetings to the website and share the info. And last but not least: you can&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;get informed with an email alert about upcoming meetings in your field.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;
&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;So, check it out and if you like it, spread the word in your lab and&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);" /&gt;&lt;span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.917969);"&gt;&amp;nbsp;institute!&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=8319</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 02:36:59 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rare fungus kills endangered rattlesnakes in southern Illinois</title><description>he eastern massasauga rattlesnake (&lt;em&gt;Sistrurus catenatus catenatus&lt;/em&gt;),  a candidate for protection under the federal Endangered Species Act,  suffers from habitat loss and environmental stresses wherever it is  found, said University of Illinois.......&amp;gt;&lt;a href="http://news.illinois.edu/news/12/0221fungus_MatthewAllender.html" target="_blank"&gt; Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=8149</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:08:29 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Road runoff spurring spotted salamander evolution</title><description>Spotted salamanders exposed to contaminated roadside ponds are adapting to their toxic environments, according to a Yale paper in &lt;em&gt;Scientific Reports&lt;/em&gt;.  This study provides the first documented evidence that a vertebrate has  adapted to the negative effects of roads apparently by evolving  rapidly.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://environment.yale.edu/news/article/road-runoff-spurring-spotted-salamander-evolution/" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=8080</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:15:55 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>German research team targets 'at risk' data on biodiversity</title><description>A new German-based project is setting out to rescue biodiversity data at  risk of being lost, because they are not integrated in institutional  databases, are kept in outdated digital storage systems, or are not  properly documented.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://www.gbif.org/communications/news-and-events/showsingle/article/german-research-team-targets-at-risk-data-on-biodiversity/" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7939</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:52:02 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>They call it 'guppy love': UCLA biologists solve an evolution mystery</title><description>Guppies in the wild have evolved over at least half-a-million years &amp;mdash;  long enough for the males' coloration to have changed dramatically. Yet a  characteristic orange patch on male guppies has remained remarkably  stable, though it could have become redder or more yellow. Why has it  stayed the same hue of orange over such a long period of time?.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/ucla-biologists-solve-an-evolution-219450.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7864</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:54:59 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tiny fossil fragment reveals giant-but-ugly-truth</title><description>New research from the Universities of Portsmouth and Leicester has  identified a small fossil fragment at the Natural History Museum, London  as being part of a giant pterosaur  &amp;ndash; setting a new upper limit for the  size of winged and toothed animals.
Dr David Martill from the University of Portsmouth and Dr David  Unwin from the University of Leicester examined the fossil - which  consisted of the tip of a pterosaur snout that had been in the Museum  collections since 1884.
Their identification of the fossil as being part of the world's largest toothed pterosaur has been published in &lt;em&gt;Cretaceous Research&lt;/em&gt;.
Dr Unwin, from the School of Museum Studies at the University of  Leicester, said: "Our study showed that the fossil represented a huge  individual with a wingspan that might have reached 7 metres. This is far  larger than, for example, any modern bird, although some extinct birds  may have reached 6 metres in wingspan.
"What this research shows is that some toothed pterosaurs reached  truly spectacular sizes and, for now, it allows us to put a likely upper  limit on that size &amp;ndash; around 7 metres in wingspan."
Dr Martill, from the University of Portsmouth, added: "It's an ugly  looking specimen, but with a bit of skill you can work out just exactly  what it was. All we  have is the tip of the upper jaws - bones called  the premaxillae, and a broken tooth preserved in one socket.
"Although the crown of the tooth has broken off, its diameter is  13mm. This is huge for a pterosaur. Once you do the calculations you  realise that the scrap in your hand is a very exciting discovery.
"The specimen was placed in the collections of London's Natural  History Museum  by Sir Richard Owen, perhaps the world's greatest  vertebrate palaeontologist. In his day, Owen reconstructed a giant New  Zealand Moa from a single bone. We might never achieve Owen's calibre,  but it is nice to think that we are following in his footsteps."
Pterosaurs are flying reptiles, famously seen in Jurassic Park, that  lived in the Mesozoic Era alongside dinosaurs between 210 and 65  million years ago.
There are six or seven major groups of toothed pterosaurs, but in  this study the researchers focused on just one: the ornithocheirids.  Unlike other toothed groups, all of which were of relatively modest size  (wingspans at most of 2 or 3 metres), they are known to have achieved  very large and possibly even giant sizes with wingspans of 6 meters or  more. Ornithocheirids were specialised fish-feeding pterosaurs that used  a fiercesome set of teeth in the tips of the jaws, to grab their prey  as they flew low and slow over the surface of the water.
Dr Unwin said: "We found that, generally speaking, large  ornithocheirids reached wingspans of 5 or 6 metres which was consistent  with previous ideas about this group. However, we also came across one  fossil, collected in the mid-19th century from a deposit in  Cambridgeshire called the Cambridge Greensand that seemed to be  unusually large.
"This fossil, now in the collections of the Natural History Museum,  London, consisted of the tip of a pterosaur snout. The shape of the  snout and the broken-off tooth that it contained allowed us to identify  the new find as belonging to Coloborhynchus capito, a very rare  ornithocheirid represented only by a few fossil fragments from the  Cambridge Greensand. Calculating the original size of the animal based  on just a fragment is difficult, but we were able to take advantage of  some recent finds in Brazil of almost complete skeletons of  ornithocheirids that are closely related to the Cambridge Greensand jaw  fragment."
"Our study showed that the fossil did indeed represent a very large  individual with a wingspan that might have reached 7 metres."
Significantly, though, this is still far short of the giant size  achieved by some toothless pterosaurs. Several species of a group called  azhdarchids achieved wingspans of around 10 metres.
The challenge for the researchers now is to try to understand why  some groups, such as azhdarchids, reached these giant sizes, while  toothed forms, such as the ornithocheirids, did not. Teeth are heavy, so  part of the explanation may lie in weight reduction by losing these.
Dr Unwin said: "This research is important because it helps us to  better understand patterns of evolution over millions of years, and in  groups that are now extinct. At a more general level, it feeds into TV  documentaries such as the current series 'Dinosaur Planet' on BBC1,  ensuring that they have the 'ring of authenticity' that ensures  successful reception, by experts and the lay public alike. Indeed, these  programs are enormously popular, as viewing figures show, allowing us  to comfort ourselves with the thought that the research we carry out is  helping to satisfy the interests of a not insignificant portion of the  viewing public.
"For Dave Martill and I, this was to some extent the 'bread and  butter' stuff that we do everyday. But it's this slow piling up of data  and, critically, its connection into our general understanding, that  leads to the really big discoveries. Dave likes to refer to the fossil  as the ugliest fossil he ever studied, and I can see his point, but as I  did my PhD on Cambridge Greensand pterosaurs they have a special place  in my affections and, no matter how ugly, I still love them."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7726</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:53:06 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sexual selection by sugar molecule helped determine human origins</title><description>Researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of  Medicine say that losing the ability to make a particular kind of sugar  molecule boosted disease protection in early hominids, and may have  directed the evolutionary emergence of our ancestors, the genus &lt;em&gt;Homo&lt;/em&gt;.
The findings, published in this week's early online edition of the &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt;,  are among the first evidence of a novel link between cell surface  sugars, Darwinian sexual selection, and immune function in the context  of human origins
Sialic acids are sugar molecules found on the surfaces of all animal  cells, where they serve as vital contact points for interaction with  other cells and with the surrounding environment, including as targets  for invasive pathogens. For millions of years, the common ancestors of  humans and other apes shared a particular kind of sialic acid known as  N-glycolylneuraminic acid or Neu5Gc. Then, for reasons possibly linked  to a malarial parasite (http://health.ucsd.edu/news/2005/Pages/09_08_Varki.aspx)  that bound Neu5Gc, a gene mutation three million or so years ago  inactivated the human enzyme involved in making the molecule. Instead,  humans began producing more of a slightly different form of sialic acid  called Neu5Ac, the precursor of Neu5Gc.
"This occurred at about the same time as early humans were  apparently becoming major predators in their environment," said Pascal  Gagneux, PhD, an evolutionary biologist and associate professor of  cellular and molecular medicine at UC San Diego. "It's hard to be sure  exactly what happened because evolution works on so many things  simultaneously, but the change in sialic acid meant that early humans  developed an immune response to Neu5Gc. It became viewed by their immune  systems as foreign, something to be destroyed. At about the same time,  they started eating red meat, a major source of Neu5Gc, which may have  further stimulated the immune response."
Gagneux and colleagues say this strong immune reaction to Neu5Gc  likely had a profound effect upon early human reproduction. In all  mammals, the biological costs of pregnancy for the female can be huge,  sometimes even life-threatening, and so it behooves females to ensure  only the best-matching sperm successfully fertilize an egg. The  scientists hypothesized that anti-Neu5Gc antibodies would target  Neu5Gc-positive sperm or fetal tissues in early humans, kill them and  thus reduce the chances of reproductive success.
The researchers tested the idea by exposing chimpanzee sperm, whose  cell surface sugars are more than half non-human sialic acids, to human  anti-Neu5Gc antibodies. The antibodies bound and killed the ape sperm in  vitro. The scientists then mated female mice genetically altered to  lack Neu5Gc and immunized to produce anti-Neu5Gc antibodies with  Neu5Gc-positive males. The fertility rate for the females was measurably  lower due to pre-zygotic incompatibility &amp;ndash; the anti-sperm effects of  female antibodies.
"Over time, this incompatibility would reduce and then eliminate  individuals with Neu5Gc," said Gagneux. "Oddly enough, based on our  theoretical model, the process works faster when the fertility rate is  only slightly decreased, rather than producing 100 percent infertility."
Gagneux noted that the findings add further weight to the concept of  "speciation by infection," in which a combination of infectious  diseases suffered by a particular population could predispose that  population to diverge from other populations due to reproductive  incompatibility. In the case of early humans, one driver may have been  female immunity to Neu5Gc.
Previous studies (http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/health/Varki%208%2022.htm)  have shown that the loss of Neu5Gc occurred about two to three million  years ago, which happens to be about the time of emergence of &lt;em&gt;Homo ergaster/erectus&lt;/em&gt;, the likely ancestor of humans.
"We suggest that the immune mechanism described here was involved in the origin of the genus &lt;em&gt;Homo&lt;/em&gt;,"  said study co-author Ajit Varki, MD, professor of medicine and cellular  and molecular medicine and director of the Center for Academic Research  and Training in Anthropogeny at UC San Diego.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7704</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:44:19 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Aquatic fish jump into picture of evolutionary land invasion</title><description>Research sometimes means looking for one  thing and finding another. Such was the case when biology  professor &lt;strong&gt;Alice Gibb&lt;/strong&gt; and her research team at Northern Arizona University  witnessed a small  amphibious fish, the mangrove rivulus, jump with apparent  skill and  purpose out of a small net and back into the water......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://www4.nau.edu/insidenau/bumps/2011/10_3_11/fish.html" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7702</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:45:07 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Researchers greatly improve evolutionary Tree of Life for mammals</title><description>An international research team led by biologists at the University of  California, Riverside and Texas A&amp;amp;M University has released for the  first time a large and robust DNA matrix that has representation for  all mammalian families.  The matrix &amp;ndash; the culmination of about five  years of painstaking research &amp;ndash; has representatives for 99 percent of  mammalian families, and covers not only the earliest history of  mammalian diversification but also all the deepest divergences among  living mammals.
"This is the first time this kind of dataset has been put together for mammals," said &lt;a href="http://facultydirectory.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/pub/public_individual.pl?faculty=733"&gt;Mark Springer&lt;/a&gt;, a professor of &lt;a href="http://www.biology.ucr.edu/"&gt;biology&lt;/a&gt; at UC Riverside, who co-led the research project with &lt;a href="http://genetics.tamu.edu/faculty/murphy_william1"&gt;William Murphy&lt;/a&gt;,  an associate professor of genetics at Texas A&amp;amp;M. "Until now, no one  has been able to assemble this kind of matrix, based on DNA sequences  from many different genes, to examine how the different families of  mammals are related to each other.  This dataset, with all the sequences  we generated, provides a large and reliable foundation &amp;ndash; a springboard &amp;ndash;  for biologists to take the next leap in this field of work.  We can now  progress from phylogeny that has representatives for all the different  mammalian families to phylogenies that have representatives for genera  and species."
Phylogeny is the history of organismal lineages as they change  through time.  A vast evolutionary tree, called the Tree of Life,  represents the phylogeny of organisms, the genealogical relationships of  all living things.
As most introductory biology textbooks will show, organisms are  biologically classified according to a hierarchical system characterized  by seven main taxonomic ranks: kingdom, phylum or division, class,  order, family, genus, species.  For example, humans are known  taxonomically as &lt;em&gt;Homo sapiens&lt;/em&gt;.  Their genus is &lt;em&gt;Homo&lt;/em&gt;, the family is Hominidae, the order is Primates and the class is Mammalia.
To date divergence times on their phylogeny of mammalian families,  Springer and colleagues used a "relaxed molecular clock."  This kind of  molecular clock allows for the use of multiple rates of evolution  instead of using one rate of evolution that governs all branches of the  Tree of Life. They also used age estimates for numerous fossil mammals  to calibrate their time tree.
"We need to have calibrations to input into the analysis so that we  know, for example, that elephants and their nearest relatives have been  separate from each other since at least the end of the Paleocene &amp;ndash; more  than 55 million years ago," Springer said. "We were able to put together  a diverse assemblage of fossil calibrations from different parts of the  mammalian tree, and we used it in conjunction with molecular  information to assemble the most robust time tree based on sequenced  data that has been developed to date."
Study results appear today (Sept. 22) in &lt;em&gt;Science Express&lt;/em&gt;.
"This study is the beginning of a larger plan to use large molecular  data sets and sophisticated techniques for dating and estimating rates  of diversification to resolve much larger portions of the mammalian  tree, ultimately including all described species, as well as those that  have gone recently extinct or for which only museum material may be  available," Murphy said.  "Only then can we really begin to understand  the role of the environment and events in earth history in promoting the  generation of living biodiversity. This phylogeny also serves as a  framework to understand the history of the unique changes in the genome  that underlie the vast morphological diversity observed in the more than  5400 living species of mammals."
Springer explained that the research team looked for spikes in  the diversification history of mammals and used an algorithm to  determine whether the rate of diversification was constant over time or  whether there were distinct pulses of rate increases or decreases.  The  researchers found an increase in the diversification rate 80-82 million  years ago, which corresponds to the time &amp;ndash; specifically, the end of the  Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution &amp;ndash; when a lot of different orders were  splitting from each other.
"This is when flowering plants diversified, which provided  opportunities for the diversification of small mammals," Springer said.
Springer and colleagues also detected a second spike in the  diversification history of mammals at the end of the Cretaceous &amp;ndash; 65.5  million years ago, when dinosaurs, other large terrestrial vertebrates,  and many marine organisms went extinct, opening up a vast ecological  space.
"Such ecological voids can get filled quickly," Springer explained.  "We see that in mammals, even though different orders such as primates  and rodents split from each other back in the Cretaceous, the orders did  not diversify into their modern representations until after the  Cretaceous, 65.5 million years ago.  The void seems to have facilitated  the radiation &amp;ndash; that is, branching in conjunction with change &amp;ndash; of  different orders of several mammals into the adaptive zones they occupy  today.  After the Cretaceous, we see increased diversification, with  some lineages becoming larger and more specialized."
The researchers stress that their time tree is a work in progress.   In the next two years, they expect to construct a supermatrix, also  based on gene sequences, and include the majority of living mammalian  species.  The current work incorporates 164 mammalian species.
"Our phylogeny, underpinned by a large number of genes, sets the  stage for us to understand how the different mammalian species are  related to each other," Springer said.  "That will help us understand  when these species diverged from each other.  It will allow us to look  for taxonomic rates of increase or decrease over time in different  groups in various parts of the world so that we can understand these  diversification rate changes in relationship to important events in  Earth's history &amp;ndash; such as the diversification of flowering plants and  changes associated with climatic events. Researchers routinely make use  of phylogenies in diverse fields such as ecology, physiology, and  biogeography, and the new phylogeny for mammalian families provides a  more accurate framework for these studies.
"When you understand how taxa are related to each other," Springer  added, "you can start to understand which changes at the genome level  underpin key morphological changes associated with, say, flight and  echolocation in bats or loss of teeth in toothless mammals.  In other  words, you can pinpoint key molecular changes that are associated with  key morphological changes.  This would be extremely difficult, if not  altogether impossible, without the kind of robust molecular phylogeny we  have developed."
The research team also reports that their results contradict the  "delayed rise of present-day mammals" hypothesis. According to this  hypothesis, introduced by a team of scientists in a 2007 research paper,  the ancestors of living mammals underwent a pulse of diversification  around 50 million years ago, possibly in response to the extinction of  archaic mammals that went extinct at the end of the Paleocene (around 56  million years ago). The earlier extinction event around 65.5 million  years ago, which resulted in the demise of the dinosaurs, had no effect  on the diversification of the ancestors of extant mammals, according to  the 2007 research paper.
"Our analysis shows that the mass extinction event 65.5 million  years ago played an important role in the early diversification and  adaptive radiation of mammals," Springer said.  "The molecular phylogeny  we used to develop the matrix is far more reliable and accurate, and  sets our work apart from previous studies."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7647</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:51:03 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Using human genomes to illuminate the mysteries of early human history</title><description>Cornell researchers have developed new statistical methods based on the  complete genome sequences of people alive today to shed light on events  at the dawn of human history.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Sept11/SiepelMigration.html" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7639</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:23:25 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>A 'jumping gene's' preferred targets may influence genome evolution</title><description>The human genome shares several peculiarities with the DNA of just  about every other plant and animal.  Our genetic blueprint contains  numerous entities known as transposons, or "jumping genes," which have  the ability to move from place to place on the chromosomes within a  cell.
An astounding 50% of human DNA comprises both active transposon  elements and the decaying remains of former transposons that were active  thousands to millions of years ago before becoming damaged and  immobile.  If all of this mobile and formerly mobile DNA were not  mysterious enough, every time a plant, animal or human cell prepares to  divide, the chromosome regions richest in transposon-derived sequences,  even elements long deceased, are among the last to duplicate.  The  reason for their delayed duplication, if there is one, has eluded  biologists for more than 50 years.
New research led by Carnegie's Allan Spradling and published online this week by &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences &lt;/em&gt;provides potential insight into both these enigmas.
The scientists used the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, one of  the premier "model" organisms for studying genome structure and gene  function.  They focused on one particular transposon, called the P  element, which has an unsurpassed ability to move that has stimulated  its widespread use by Drosophila researchers.
Remarkably, P elements have only been present in Drosophila  melanogaster for about 80 years, at which time they were acquired from  the genome of a distantly related fruit fly species by an unknown  process.  P elements remain highly "infective" today.  Adding just one  copy to the genome of one fly causes all the flies in a laboratory  population with which it breeds to acquire 30 to 50 P elements within a  few generations.  The original goal of the Spradling team's research was  not to understand how transposons spread or genomes evolve, but  something much simpler: To learn why P elements insert at some locations  in the genome but not in others.
Spradling and his colleagues, who oversee the NIH-funded Drosophila  "Gene Disruption Project" used a database containing more than 50,000  genomic sites where P elements have inserted. They built this  exceptional database over the last 20 years.
P elements insert into DNA very selectively. Nearly 40% of new jumps  occur within just 300 genes and always near the beginning of the gene.  But the genes seemed to have nothing in common.  When these sites were  compared to data about the Drosophila genome, particularly recent  studies of Drosophila genome duplication, the answer became clear.  What  many P insertion sites share in common is an ability to function as  starting sites or "origins" for DNA duplication.  This association  between P elements and the machinery of genome duplication suggested  that they can coordinate their movement with DNA replication.
Spradling and his team propose that P elements&amp;mdash;and likely other  transposons as well&amp;mdash;use a replication connection to spread more rapidly  through genomes. These elements would only transpose after replicating,  and then preferentially insert themselves into portions of DNA that have  not yet become activated.  This would allow them to duplicate twice  rather than just once during the genome duplication cycle.
If the elements get a late start, however, only the last segments of  the chromosome to duplicate will be left for their second duplication.  This explains tendency of such regions to be transposon-rich.  However,  the researchers found that two other Drosophila transposons, known as  piggyBac and Minos, do not insert at replication origins, so this  mechanism is far from universal.  Furthermore, Spradling cautioned that  it is particularly difficult to experimentally test hypotheses about  evolution.
"By gaining insight into one specific transposon's movements, we may  have begun to glimpse mechanisms that have profoundly influenced genome  evolution for nearly all animals" Spradling commented.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7583</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:25:55 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Genetic map of African-Americans to aid study of diseases, human evolution</title><description>A group of researchers from the University of Oxford, Harvard Medical  School and the University of Mississippi Medical Center has constructed  the world's most detailed genetic map, a tool scientists can use to  better understand the roots of disease and how DNA is passed  generationally to create diversity in the human species.
About 5,000 Jackson-area volunteers were included in a group of  nearly 30,000 African-Americans whose genetic information the scientists  used to create the map.
The map pinpoints genome locations where people splice together DNA  from their mothers and fathers to produce sperm or eggs. That process,  known as recombination, mixes DNA from the person's parents and passes  it on to his or her children.
Almost every prior genetic map was developed in people of European  ancestry. The new map is the first built in African-Americans.
"The world's best genetic map is now built in African-Americans,"  said David Reich, professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, who  co-led the study with Simon Myers, a lecturer in statistics at the  University of Oxford. "This map, built in 30,000 African-Americans who  are from studies of heart disease and cancer, has a resolution so high  it is now the world's most accurate map."
The findings will be published in the July 21 edition of &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;.
Dr. James Wilson, UMMC professor of medicine and the study's  coordinator, said the map holds promise for both broad, genome-wide  applications and narrowly focused, single-disease research.
"The map will be helpful in finding the genetic roots of any disease  that's affected by inheritance &amp;ndash; which is virtually every disease," he  said.
For example, studies have shown certain diseases, such as  hypertension, affect African-Americans at greater rates than whites,  even with other variables like age, weight and socioeconomic level  accounted for. The map could be used to better understand why.
A surprise was that the map turned out to be different than those based on people of European and other non-African ancestries.
"The landscape of recombination has shifted in African-Americans  compared with Europeans," said Anjali Hinch, the study's first author  and a post-graduate student at the Oxford University's Wellcome Trust  Centrefor Human Genetics.
Wilson said the African-American genome has become distinct because  of recombination in the U.S. during the past two to three centuries.
"African-Americans are a genetically distinguishable group from  other continental populations," he said. "African-Americans differ from  their African ancestors in that most of them also have genes from  European ancestors."
The researchers knew that going into the project. But once they  analyzed the breakpoints where recombination occurs in African-American  genomes, an unexpected difference appeared.
"Over half of African-Americans carry a version of the biological  machinery for recombination that is different to that in Europeans. As a  result, African-Americans experience recombination where it almost  never occurs in Europeans," Myers said.
Scientists have only recently begun to explore the genetic  differences between individuals and populations &amp;mdash; and the roles those  differences play in human health. In that respect, the first draft of  the human genome, completed a decade ago, was only a starting point for  understanding the genetic origins of disease.
As researchers begin to parse those differences, a crucial tool is a  genetic map, as it determines how some groups of genetic differences  tend to be inherited together. Recombination, together with mutation,  accounts for all the genetic (and thus physical) variety we see within  species. But while mutation refers to the errors introduced into single  locations within genomes when cells divide, recombination refers to the  process by which huge chunks of chromosomes are stitched together during  sexual reproduction.
A key to the success of genetic maps is that this stitching occurs  only at specific locations in the genome. In a landmark set of papers,  Myers and his colleagues previously identified a particular DNA code, or  motif, that attracted the recombination machinery. Knowing the motif, a  string of 13 DNA letters, researchers could zero in on the exact  locations where recombination typically occurred&amp;mdash;the "recombination  hotspots."
"When recombination goes wrong, it's known that this can lead to  mutations causing congenital diseases, for example diseases like  Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, or certain anemias. We found the same  13-base motif marking many of these disease-mutation sites," said Myers.
Reich, who is also a senior associate member of the Broad Institute,  said the places in the genome where there are recombination hotspots  can also be disease hotspots.
"Charting recombination hotspots can thus bring us to the places in the genome that cause disease," he said.
The researchers discovered that the 13 base-pair motif responsible  for many hotspots in Europeans accounts for only two-thirds as much  recombination in African-Americans. They connected the remaining third  to a new motif of 17 base pairs, which is recognized by a version of the  recombinational machinery that occurs almost exclusively in people of  African ancestry.
These findings are expected to help researchers understand the roots  of congenital conditions that occur more often in African-Americans  (due to mutations at the hotspots that are more common in  African-Americans), and also to help discover new disease genes in all  populations, because of the ability to map these genes more precisely.
The new map is so accurate specifically because so many  African-Americans have both African and European genes, due to racial  mixing during the last couple of hundred years. Reich and Myers are  experts in analyzing genetic data to reconstruct the mosaic of regions  of African and European genetic ancestry in DNA of modern  African-Americans.
Using a computer program Reich and Myers wrote specifically to sort  the massive amounts of data, Hinch identified places in the genomes of  the 30,000 people where switches occurred between African and European  ancestry, detecting about 70 per person. These switches correspond to  recombination events in the last couple of hundred years, resulting in  the more than 2 million recombination events that the researchers used  to build the map.
The study was only possible because of collaboration from 81  co-authors from many institutions, using DNA samples from five large  studies that had previously been carried out to study common diseases  such as heart disease and cancer, funded by the National Institutes of  Health, the Department of Defense, and many private foundations.
"All the co-authors worked together in an incredibly collegial way  to put together the enormous set of samples and high quality genetic  data that made this study a success," Wilson said.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7412</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:17:37 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sniffing out lymphoma by turning dogs into humans</title><description>Researchers at North Carolina State University are narrowing the  search for genes involved in non-Hodgkin lymphoma &amp;ndash; by turning dogs into  humans.
Humans and dogs don&amp;rsquo;t just share companionship and living space, they  also share a similar genetic makeup. Additionally, they share the same  types of cancer, including lymphoma. Dr. Matthew Breen,  professor of genomics at NC State, uses canines as a genetic model for  studying lymphoma because purebred dogs of the same breed have less  genetic variation among them than humans do, making it easier to  pinpoint areas on canine chromosomes that may be involved with cancer.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://news.ncsu.edu/releases/breen-lymphoma/" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=7036</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:23:29 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>UCSB scientists get glimpse of how the 'code' of life may have emerged</title><description>A portion of the "code" of life has been unraveled by a UC Santa Barbara graduate student from the town of Jojutla, Mexico.
Annia Rodriguez worked with John Perona, professor in UCSB's  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, to decipher intramolecular  communication within a large RNA-protein enzyme responsible for  expressing the genetic code for the amino acid glutamine.
To their surprise, the experiments by Rodriguez captured a partial  glimpse of how the genetic coding of life may have emerged. The results  of the study are published in the journal Structure, published by CELL.
Life is based on the ability of all living cells to convert the  genetic information in DNA, into the specific sequences of amino acids  that make up the proteins that are the cell's workhorses. The key  reaction in this decoding process is the attachment of a particular  amino acid to one end of a small RNA molecule known as a transfer RNA.  The enzyme that catalyzes this amino acid-RNA attachment is the  aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase.
Rodriguez performed many laborious experiments in which she removed  portions of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that interact with the  anticodon stem of the transfer RNA, far from the part of the enzyme that  binds the amino acid. Using a biochemical approach known as rapid  chemical quench kinetics, Rodriguez discovered that when she made these  changes to the enzyme, the binding of the amino acid to the protein was  strengthened, even though the amino acid binds far away from the  positions where the changes were made.
"It is totally counterintuitive," said Perona. "Imagine if you had a  car, and you took out a gear, and the car went faster. Why would you  want that gear if it makes your car go slower?"
In all, Rodriguez found that separately removing seven different  "gears" from a distant part of the molecule each caused the amino acid  to bind more tightly to the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Perona explained  that this provides the first systematic analysis demonstrating  long-range communication in an enzyme that depends on RNA for its  function.
"So what we think is going on is that these enzyme-RNA interactions  far from the amino acid binding site evolved together with the needs of  the cell to respond to subtle cues from its environment &amp;ndash; especially in  terms of how much amino acid is available," said Perona. "It makes sense  in terms of evolution."
Rodriguez is the first in her family to pursue a Ph.D., which she  will complete this year. Now 28 years old, she began her career as a  nurse in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Then she went on to obtain a B.S. in  biochemical engineering at the Instituto Tecnol&amp;oacute;gico de Zacatepec.
Graduation from her undergraduate program called for work at a  research institution and she chose UCSB. Upon graduation, Rodriguez was  offered a prestigious five-year scholarship with Mexico's Consejo  Nacional de Ciencia y Technolog&amp;iacute;a (CONACYT) to continue her studies at  UCSB.
Although her current research is not focused specifically on human  health, Rodriguez said: "My interest in biochemistry started because I  wanted to know the mechanisms by which drugs and medications worked  inside the human body. I wanted to learn not just the signs and symptoms  of disease, but how diseases are developed in a molecular level."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6952</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 03:17:58 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>First image of protein residue in 50 million year old reptile skin</title><description>Published in the journal Royal Society Proceedings B: Biology, the  brightly-coloured image shows the presence of amides &amp;ndash; the organic  compounds, or building blocks of life &amp;ndash; in the ancient skin of a  reptile, found in the 50 million year-old rocks of the Green River  Formation in Utah, USA.
This image had never been seen by the human eye, until a team led by  Dr Roy Wogelius and Dr Phil Manning used state-of-the-art infra-red  technology at The University of Manchester to reveal and map the  fossilized soft tissue of a beautifully-preserved reptile.
These infra-red maps are backed up by the first ever  element-specific maps of organic material in fossil skin generated using  X-rays at the Stanford synchrotron in the USA, also by the Manchester  researchers.
Chemical details are clear enough that the scientists, from the  School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, are even able  to propose how this exceptional preservation occurs.
When the original compounds in the skin begin to break down they can  form chemical bonds with trace metals, and under exceptional conditions  these trace metals act like a 'bridge' to minerals in the sediments.  This protects the skin material from being washed away or decomposing  further.
Geochemist Roy Wogelius: "The mapped distributions of organic  compounds and trace metals in 50 million year old skin look so much like  maps we've made of modern lizard skin as a check on our work, it is  sometimes hard to tell which is the fossil and which is fresh."
"These new infra-red and X-ray methods reveal intricate chemical  patterns that have been overlooked by traditional methods for decades."
The new images are compelling, and represent the next step in the  academics' research programme to use modern analytical chemistry and  21st century techniques to understand how such remarkable preservation  occurs, and ultimately to discover the chemistry of ancient life.
These new results imply that trace metal inventories and patterns in  ancient reptile skin, even after fossilisation, can indeed be compared  to modern reptiles.
The infra-red light causes vibrations in the fossilized skin, and a  map of where these vibrations occur can be obtained from a fossil by  using a trick: a tiny crystal (like an old phonograph record stylus)  which moves from point-to-point in a programmable grid across the  surface.
At each point where the tiny crystal touches the fossil, an  infra-red beam that shines through the crystal reflects off of the  crystal base, but a small amount of the beam probes beyond the  interface- and if organic compounds are present, they absorb portions of  the beam and change the reflected signal.
This allows the team to non-destructively map large fossils which do  not themselves transmit or reflect the beam &amp;ndash; a revolutionary process  for paleontologists.
Nick Edwards, first author on the publication, said: "The ability to  chemically analyse rare and precious fossils such as these without the  need to remove material and destroy them is an important and long  overdue addition to field of palaeontology.
"Hopefully this will provide future opportunities to unlock the information stored in other similarly preserved specimens."
Dr Manning said: "Here physics, palaeontology and chemistry have  collided to yield incredible insight to the building blocks of  fossilized soft tissue.
"The results of this study have wider implications, such as  understanding what happens to buried wastes over long periods of time.  The fossil record provides us with a long-running experiment, from which  we can learn in order to help resolve current problems."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6947</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 03:50:30 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Evolutionary 'winners' and 'losers' revealed in collaborative study</title><description>In a study that literally analyzed competing bacteria fighting it out  to the death, a University of Houston (UH) researcher and his  colleagues identified evolutionary 'winners' and 'losers.' Continuing  research to understand the basis of these fates may become a useful tool  is designing roadblocks to antibiotic resistance.
In collaboration with scientists at Michigan State University (MSU),  UH evolutionary biologist Timothy Cooper and his graduate student  Utpala Shrestha were co-authors on a paper titled "Second-Order  Selection for Evolvability in a Large Escherichia coli Population." The  report appeared March 18 in &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;, the world's leading journal of original scientific research, global news and commentary.
"The project found that bacteria growing for thousands of  generations in an environment containing glucose as the only food had  evolved to be better at getting better," Cooper said. "We found that two  lineages of bacteria arose and competed in a single experimental  population. The lineage that initially grew more slowly, yet had the  potential to evolve more rapidly, was the evolutionary 'winner.' This is  surprising because it's usually thought that competition is decided by  what competitors can do now and not what they are capable of in the  future."
As genetic changes occurred, making some individuals better  competitors on the glucose food, other individuals that did not quickly  get their own beneficial mutations were outcompeted and went extinct.  Down the line, understanding the benefits of evolving quickly like this  will be a useful tool to predict such things as antibiotic resistance  and the evolution of infectious disease. Cooper said this knowledge may  one day help scientists design intervention strategies that make the  evolution of these traits less likely to occur.
The work done by Cooper and Shrestha at UH established the specific  genetic changes occurring during this bacterial evolution experiment  that caused the change in their ability to evolve further. They  discovered the genetic change that was important for determining which  bacteria would prevail and which were destined to become extinct.
"Our collaborators isolated individual bacteria from a population  that had evolved for 500 generations and sequenced their entire DNA  genome to determine all the changes that had occurred," Cooper said. "By  isolating these changes and adding them in defined combinations back  into the original ancestral strain, we were able to determine their  individual effects."
Reminiscent of Aesop's lesson that 'slow and steady wins the race,'  Cooper adds that even bacteria can benefit from a long-term view, with  their experiment showing that bacteria that adapted, slowly but  consistently, outcompeted those that initially grew quickly but then ran  out of ways to improve.
With much of his work based on experimental evolution, which is the  lab-based study of evolving populations, Cooper's motivation for this  experiment comes from wanting to understand the factors involved in  evolution of organisms to better fit their environments. Using bacterial  and computational experimental systems he aims to identify and  integrate these mechanisms and examine how they depend on genetic and  environmental factors.
"Bacteria provide an ideal model system to address these questions,  because they evolve so quickly, undergoing thousands of generations in  only a few years," Cooper said. "Additionally, we can now sequence their  entire genomes and determine the genetic changes that lead to  improvements in their ability to grow."
Funded by the National Science Foundation and the Defense Advanced  Research Projects Agency, this work was a multidisciplinary effort done  in collaboration with researchers in zoology, microbiology and molecular  genetics at MSU. In addition to UH's Cooper and Shrestha, the MSU team  consisted of Richard Lenski, Jeffrey Barrick, Robert Woods and Mark  Kauth. Woods has since moved on to the University of Michigan and  Barrick is currently at the University of Texas at Austin.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6945</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 03:47:30 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>UF researcher: Flowering plant study 'catches evolution in the act'</title><description>A new University of Florida study shows when two flowering plants are  crossed to produce a new hybrid, the new species' genes are reset,  allowing for greater genetic variation.
Researchers say the study, to be published March 17 in &lt;em&gt;Current Biology&lt;/em&gt;, could lead to a better understanding of how to best grow more stable and higher yielding agricultural crops.
"We caught evolution in the act," said Doug Soltis, a distinguished  professor in UF's biology department and study co-author. "New and  diverse patterns of gene expression may allow the new species to rapidly  adapt in new environments."
The study shows the new plant species had relaxed control of gene  expression in its earliest generations. But today, after 80 years of  evolution, control has been regained, allowing for the production of  different patterns of gene expression in different plants. The new  species was remade in UF greenhouses as well as studied in its natural  habitat.
Researchers analyzed Tragopogon miscellus, a species in the daisy  family that originated naturally through hybridization in the northwest  U.S. about 80 years ago. The new species formed when two species  introduced from Europe mated to produce a hybrid offspring. The species  mated before in Europe, but the hybrids were never successful. However,  in America something new happened &amp;ndash; the number of chromosomes in the  hybrid spontaneously doubled, and at once it became larger than its  parents and quickly spread.
"No one had extended this to natural populations and the rapidity at  which this can occur, and that's pretty astonishing," said Jonathan  Wendel, professor and chairman of the department of ecology, evolution,  and organismal biology at Iowa State University. "That species is such a  beautiful model for that."
Hybridization with chromosome doubling is a prominent mode of  species formation and through this study scientists can better  understand how different plant groups originated.
"Understanding the impacts this process has on genome structure may  help understand how best to breed crops for high and stable yields,"  said study co-author Pat Schnable, director of the Center for Plant  Genomics at Iowa State University.
Before discovering their relaxed gene expression, the team had  expected the artificial hybrids to exhibit a combination of the parents'  genes, said study co-author Pam Soltis, curator of molecular  systematics and evolutionary genetics at the Florida Museum of Natural  History on the UF campus.
"What we found was a surprise," said lead author Richard Buggs of  Queen Mary University of London, who worked on the study as a  postdoctoral researcher at the Florida Museum. "It's as if hybridization  and chromosome doubling hit a reset button on gene expression, turning  them all on -- this could allow subsequent generations to experiment by  switching off different genes."
The expression of the hybrid plant's genes in all tissues at all  times allowed natural selection to shape what would emerge generations  later, Pam Soltis said. With this form of hybridization, there is the  opportunity for parental patterns to be equalized, as if the hybrid has a  fresh chance to exhibit a wide variety of genetic expressions over  time.
Its two parent species, Tragopogon dubius and Tragopogon pratensis,  were introduced to the U.S. in the 1920s. The researchers started making  the artificial hybrids in 2004 and the plants take about one year to  grow from seed to being able to produce seeds, Pam Soltis said.
"Tragopogon miscellus is unique because we actually know when it  originated," Pam Soltis said. "Museum collections tell us when the  parent species were introduced, allowing us to infer the age of the  hybrid species."
The researchers studied 144 duplicated gene pairs from the  40-generation-old Tragogogon miscellus, whose common name is goatsbeard.  Because the flower of the plant only blooms for a few hours in the  morning, it is often referred to as "John-go-to-bed-at-noon." It looks  like a daisy except for being either purple or yellow in color.
"The Soltises are showing at the genetic level how this really  important process of genome doubling generates new biological  diversity," Wendel said. "This leads to new questions and the design of  new experiments that can help us understand the ecological and  evolutionary consequences of the genetic changes they're observing."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6927</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:49:41 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>'Fly tree of life' mapped, adds big branch of evolutionary knowledge</title><description>Calling it the "new periodic table for flies," researchers at North  Carolina State University and collaborators across the globe have mapped  the evolutionary history of flies, providing a framework for further  comparative studies on the insects that comprise more than 10 percent of  all life on Earth.
The research, published today in the online edition of &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt;,  plugs gaps in the 260-million-year history of the fly order Diptera,  says Dr. Brian Wiegmann, NC State professor of entomology and primary  investigator of the fly tree of life project. While providing the most  comprehensive picture of fly life over the ages, the tree should allow  scientists to tease out answers to other puzzling questions about flies,  like how some traits, such as blood feeding, appeared and reappeared  many times across millions of years of evolution. The results of future  studies based on the information provided by the tree may have important  impacts on human health and the environment; flies have a substantial  impact on society as vectors of killer diseases like malaria, as  agricultural pests, and as important pollinators and decomposers.
"Flies have a long history of evolutionary success in all sorts of  environments," Wiegmann says. "For example, there are fly larvae that  live in petroleum, in hot springs, in the gills of land crabs, on the  dung of millipedes and within bee hives. The fly tree of life allows us  to learn more about both the pattern and the process of evolutionary  change, and to make predictions about new discoveries."
Using the most complete set of fly genetic and structural  anatomy data ever collected, the paper shows that members of the oldest,  still-living fly families are rare, anatomically strange flies with  long legs and long wings that grow up in fast-flowing mountain waters.
"Flies' origins and evolutionary history began in wet  environments," Wiegmann says. "As flies diversified, they became more  well-suited to terrestrial life. In general, they have flexible life  histories that have allowed them to flourish in opportunistic ways."
Life on Earth has emerged in bursts of diversification, and  fly evolution mirrors this process: flies became more diverse in three  large episodes occurring at 220, 180 and 65 million years ago. Just as  dinosaurs were becoming extinct, flies and moths were experiencing the  largest diversification of animals that has occurred in the past 65  million years. The paper also shows the number of times that different  fly lifestyles evolved; there are 12 different and independent occasions  when flies began feeding on blood, for example, and 18 times when,  ironically, flies lost their wings.
Some results were surprising. The study showed that the nearest relatives of &lt;em&gt;Drosophila&lt;/em&gt;,  the fruit fly that many key scientific discoveries have been based on,  are two unusual parasites: bee lice, wingless flies that live on honey  bees; and &lt;em&gt;Cryptochetidae&lt;/em&gt;, flies used as biological controls of crop pests.
"Flies are more ecologically diverse than any other organism,"  Wiegmann says. "There are so many different kinds &amp;ndash; 152,000 named  species &amp;ndash; and they do so many different things that they've been a  particularly difficult puzzle for scientists. We still haven't found all  the flies that exist, so there are still some surprises out there. But  this work unlocks some of the mysteries of the fly evolutionary tree and  adds a major branch to the tree of life for all living things."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6900</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:18:45 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Missing DNA makes us human</title><description>Chimpanzees and humans are minimally different genetically, but the  small differences are what make us human, according to a team of  researchers who identified segments of non-coding DNA missing in humans  that exist in chimpanzees and other animals.
"The technology now lets us look at the genomes of humans and other  mammals and find sites where humans are unique," said Philip Reno,  assistant professor of anthropology, Penn State. "We can now correlate  that information with specific human physical characteristics."
DNA is composed of gene segments that code for proteins and  non-coding segments that initiate and regulate the work of the coding  segments. While the coding segments are important, the non-coding  segments are the control mechanism of the organism. Without changing the  coding gene, increasing or decreasing the amount the gene is expressed  can have significant influence on what the organism looks like and how  it functions.
The researchers, while at Stanford University, first compared the  human genome with that of chimpanzees and other mammals to locate areas  of complete deletion in the human genome.
"We confirm 510 such deletions in humans, which fall almost  exclusively in non-coding regions and are enriched near genes involved  in steroid hormone signaling and neural function," the researchers  report in today's (Mar. 7) issue of &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;.
One sequence missing in humans is next to the androgen receptor  gene. The absence of this particular region of non-coding DNA may have  two consequences -- the human loss of sensory whiskers and small  keratinous spines on the penis.
"We often think of brain size and bipedalism as key characteristics  of what makes us human," said Reno. "But another difference is our  sexual behavior."
He notes that chimpanzees have quick intercourse because the male  chimpanzees are in a competition to see which male can fertilize the one  receptive female. This situation occurs when many males copulate with  one or a few females. The chimpanzee's penile spines, because they are  tactile, may enhance this rapid copulation.
Human ancestors, however, likely evolved to favor pair-bonding  relationships and group living. The loss of penile spines may have  prolonged intercourse to reinforce the pair bond where partners are  beneficial for the successful raising of offspring.
"We now have the genetic sequence of three separate Neanderthal  individuals," said Reno. "Looking at these same non-coding areas, the  Neanderthal genome lacks them as well."
The absence of these non-coding locations in Neanderthal positions  the DNA losses to between 7 million years ago, when human ancestors  split from chimpanzees, and 800,000 years ago, when human ancestors  split from Neanderthal.
Another area of non-coding DNA the researchers found missing in humans was near a tumor suppressor gene expressed in the brain.
"During development of mammals, a lot of neurons die in the  formation of the brain," said Reno. "The absence of this sequence down  regulates expression of the gene that leads to cell death and leads to  larger brains."
The researchers suggest that they can test other locations  associated with human-specific characteristics using functional studies  like those used in this research.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6877</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:28:49 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Skin color: Handy tool for teaching evolution</title><description>Variations in skin color provide one of the best examples of  evolution by natural selection acting on the human body and should be  used to teach evolution in schools, according to a Penn State  anthropologist.
"There is an inherent level of interest in skin color and for  teachers, that is a great bonus -- kids want to know," said Nina  Jablonski, professor and head, Department of Anthropology, Penn State.  "The mechanism of evolution can be completely understood from skin  color."
Scientists have understood for years that evolutionary selection  of skin pigmentation was caused by the sun. As human ancestors  gradually lost their pelts to allow evaporative cooling through  sweating, their naked skin was directly exposed to sunlight. In the  tropics, natural selection created darkly pigmented individuals to  protect against the sun.
Ultraviolet B radiation produces vitamin D in human skin, but  can destroy folate. Folate is important for the rapid growth of cells,  especially during pregnancy, when its deficiency can cause neural tube  defects. Destruction of folate and deficiencies in vitamin D are  evolutionary factors because folate-deficient mothers produce fewer  children who survive, and vitamin D-deficient women are less fertile  than healthy women.
Dark skin pigmentation in the tropics protects people from  folate destruction, allowing normal reproduction. However, because  levels of ultraviolet B are high year round, the body can still produce  sufficient vitamin D. As humans moved out of Africa, they moved into the  subtropics and eventually inhabited areas up to the Arctic Circle.  North or south of 46 degrees latitude -- Canada, Russia, Scandinavia,  Western Europe and Mongolia -- dark-skinned people could not produce  enough vitamin D, while lighter-skinned people could and thrived.  Natural selection of light skin occurred.
The differences between light-skinned and dark-skinned people  are more interesting than studying changes in the wing color of moths  or, the most commonly used evolutionary example, bacterial colonies,  according to Jablonski. Adaptation to the environment through  evolutionary change becomes even more interesting when looking at the  mechanism of tanning.
"In the middle latitudes tanning evolved multiple times as a  mechanism to partly protect humans from harmful effect of the sun,"  Jablonski told attendees at the annual meeting of the American  Association for the Advancement of Science today (Feb. 20) in  Washington, D.C.
Tanning evolved for humans so that when ultraviolet B radiation  increases in early spring, the skin gradually darkens. As the sun  becomes stronger, the tan deepens. During the winter, as ultraviolet B  wanes, so does the tan, allowing appropriate protection against folate  destruction but sufficient vitamin D production. Tanning evolved in  North Africa, South America, the Mediterranean and most of China.
Natural variation in skin color due to natural selection can be  seen in nearly every classroom in the U.S. because humans now move  around the globe far faster than evolution can adjust for the sun. The  idea that variation in skin color is due to where someone's ancestors  originated and how strong the sun was in those locations is inherently  interesting, Jablonski noted.
"People are really socially aware of skin color, intensely  self-conscious about it," she said. "The nice thing about skin color is  that we can teach the principles of evolution using an example on our  own bodies and relieve a lot of social stress about personal skin color  at the same time."
Jablonski noted that the ability to tan developed in a wide  variety of peoples and while the outcome, tanablity, is the same, the  underlying genetic mechanisms are not necessarily identical. She also  noted that depigmentated skin also developed at least three times  through different genetic mechanisms. Students who never tan, will also  understand why they do not and that they never will.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6749</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:27:49 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Subtle shifts, not major sweeps, drove human evolution</title><description>The most popular model used by geneticists for the last 35 years to  detect the footprints of human evolution may overlook more common subtle  changes, a new international study finds.
Classic selective sweeps, when a beneficial genetic mutation quickly  spreads through the human population, are thought to have been the  primary driver of human evolution. But a new computational analysis,  published in the February 18, 2011 issue of &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;, reveals that such events may have been rare, with little influence on the history of our species.
By examining the sequences of nearly 200 human genomes, research led  by Ryan Hernandez, PhD, assistant professor of Bioengineering and  Therapeutic Sciences at the University of California at San Francisco,  found new evidence arguing against selective sweeps as the dominant mode  of human adaptation.
The reversal suggests that smaller changes in multiple genes may  have been the primary driver of changes in human phenotypes, and that  new models are needed to retrace the genetic steps of evolution.
"Our findings suggest that recent human adaptation has not taken  place through the arrival and spread of single changes of large effect,  but through shifts of frequency in many places of the genome," said  Molly Przeworski, PhD, professor of Human Genetics and Ecology &amp;amp;  Evolution at the University of Chicago and co-senior author of the  paper. "It suggests that human adaptation, like most common human  diseases, has a complex genetic architecture."
Under the classic selective sweep model, a new, advantageous gene  appears and quickly spreads through the population. Because of its rapid  rise, the gene becomes fixed in the genome with less variation than a  gene that spread more slowly and was subject to the shuffling effects of  recombination.
Geneticists have used this model to look for genetic segments  surrounded by "troughs" of low variation, the theoretical footprint of a  selective sweep. Applying the model has identified more than 2,000  genes &amp;ndash; roughly 10 percent of the human genome &amp;ndash; suggesting that  selective sweeps were a frequent occurrence that drove the evolution of  humans away from their primate ancestors.
"The selective sweep model was introduced in 1974 and has pretty  much been the central model ever since," Przeworski said. "It is fair to  say that it is the model behind almost every scan for selection done to  date, in humans or in other organisms."
However, areas of low diversity around gene segments might also be  produced by other evolutionary mechanisms. To test whether selective  sweeps were the predominant cause of these troughs, a group of  scientists from the University of Chicago, the University of California  at San Francisco, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the University of  Oxford used data from179 subjects in the 1000 Genomes Project, an  international effort to catalogue human variation.
"This is really a groundbreaking dataset that allowed this type of  analysis to be done for the very first time," Hernandez said.
The research team looked at genes with human-specific substitutions,  where the nucleotide sequence is different from close primate  relatives. In some cases, the new sequence switches an amino acid in the  protein the gene encodes, a replacement that likely improved the  protein's function. In other genes, the sequence change is "synonymous,"  coding for the same amino acid as before and leaving the protein's  function unperturbed. Under the classic selective sweep model, genetic  diversity would be lower surrounding the first group of mutations, those  that produced beneficial changes in function, because of their quick  spread.
But when the two groups were compared, the troughs of low diversity  were similar for genes that produce functional changes and genes with  synonymous substitutions that do not. The result suggests that classic  selective sweeps could not have been the most common cause of these low  diversity troughs, leaving the door open for other modes of evolution.
"Phenotypic variation in humans isn't as simple as we thought it  would be," Hernandez said. "The idea that human adaptation might proceed  by single changes at the amino acid level is quite a nice idea, and  it's great that we have a few concrete examples of where that occurred,  but it's too simplistic a view."
Further evidence against common selective sweeps was provided by  comparing genome variation in different populations. Because Nigerian,  European, and Chinese/Japanese populations separated roughly 100,000  years ago and subsequently adapted to different environments, frequent  selective sweeps would be expected to fix clear genetic differences  between the populations.
However, comparing genomes of different populations from the 1000  Genomes Project detected only subtle differences in allele frequencies,  representative of small changes over time rather than rapid sweeps.
"It dovetails quite well with findings coming out of medical mapping  studies, which also suggest that many loci of small effect influence  disease risk," Przeworski said. "These findings call into question how  much more there is to find using the selective sweep approach, and  should also make us skeptical of how many of the findings to date will  turn out to be validated."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6737</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:22:27 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Biological anthropologists question claims for human ancestry</title><description>"Too simple" and "not so fast" suggest biological anthropologists  from the George Washington University and New York University about the  origins of human ancestry. In the upcoming issue of the journal &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;,  the anthropologists question the claims that several prominent fossil  discoveries made in the last decade are our human ancestors. Instead,  the authors offer a more nuanced explanation of the fossils' place in  the Tree of Life.  They conclude that instead of being our ancestors the  fossils more likely belong to extinct distant cousins.
"Don't get me wrong, these are all important finds," said co-author  Bernard Wood, University Professor of Human Origins and professor of  Human Evolution Anatomy at GW and director of its Center for the  Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology. "But to simply assume that  anything found in that time range has to be a human ancestor is na&amp;iuml;ve."
The paper, "The evolutionary context of the first hominins," reconsiders the evolutionary relationships of fossils named &lt;em&gt;Orrorin&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Sahelanthropus&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Ardipithecus&lt;/em&gt;, dating from four to seven million years ago, which have been claimed to be the earliest human ancestors.  &lt;em&gt;Ardipithecus&lt;/em&gt;,  commonly known as "Ardi," was discovered in Ethiopia and was found to  be radically different from what many researchers had expected for an  early human ancestor. Nonetheless, the scientists who made the discovery  were adamant it is a human ancestor.
"We are not saying that these fossils are definitively not early  human ancestors," said co-author Terry Harrison, a professor in NYU's  Department of Anthropology and director of its Center for the Study of  Human Origins. "But their status has been presumed rather than  adequately demonstrated, and there are a number of alternative  interpretations that are possible. We believe that it is just as likely  or more likely that they are fossil apes situated close to the ancestry  of the living great ape and humans."
The authors are skeptical about the interpretation of the  discoveries and advocate a more nuanced approach to classifying the  fossils. Wood and Harrison argue that it is na&amp;iuml;ve to assume that all  fossils are the ancestors of creatures alive today and also note that  shared morphology or homoplasy &amp;ndash; the same characteristics seen in  species of different ancestry &amp;ndash; was not taken into account by the  scientists who found and described the fossils. For example, the authors  claim that for &lt;em&gt;Ardipithecus&lt;/em&gt; to be a human ancestor, one must  assume that homoplasy does not exist in our lineage, but is common in  the lineages closest to ours. The authors suggest there are a number of  potential interpretations of these fossils and that being a human  ancestor is by no means the simplest, or most parsimonious explanation.
The scientific community has long concluded that the human lineage  diverged from that of the chimpanzee six to eight million years ago. It  is easy to differentiate between the fossils of a modern-day chimpanzee  and a modern human. However, it is more difficult to differentiate  between the two species when examining fossils that are closer to their  common ancestor, as is the case with &lt;em&gt;Orrorin&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Sahelanthropus&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Ardipithecus&lt;/em&gt;.
In their paper, Wood and Harrison caution that history has shown how  uncritical reliance on a few similarities between fossil apes and  humans can lead to incorrect assumptions about evolutionary  relationships. They point to the case of &lt;em&gt;Ramapithecus&lt;/em&gt;, a species  of fossil ape from south Asia, which was mistakenly assumed to be an  early human ancestor in the 1960s and 1970s, but later found to be a  close relative of the orangutan.
Similarly, &lt;em&gt;Oreopithecus bambolii&lt;/em&gt;, a fossil ape from Italy  shares many similarities with early human ancestors, including features  of the skeleton that suggest that it may have been well adapted for  walking on two legs. However, the authors observe, enough is known of  its anatomy to show that it is a fossil ape that is only distantly  related to humans, and that it acquired many "human-like" features in  parallel.
Wood and Harrison point to the small canines in &lt;em&gt;Ardipithecus&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Sahelanthropus&lt;/em&gt; as possibly the most convincing evidence to support their status as  early human ancestors. However, canine reduction was not unique to the  human lineage for it occurred independently in several lineages of  fossil apes (e.g., Oreopithecus, Ouranopithecus and Gigantopithecus)  presumably as a result of similar shifts in dietary behavior.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6726</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:22:41 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>MU, ASU researchers' discovery could change views of human evolution</title><description>Feet arches give humans a spring in their steps, shock absorbing  abilities, and stiff platforms to propel themselves forward, allowing  them to walk upright consistently. Now, researchers at the University of  Missouri and Arizona State University have found proof that arches  existed in a predecessor to the human species that lived more than 3  million years ago. This discovery could change scientists' views of  human evolution. The study is being published this week in &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;.
Carol Ward, an MU researcher in the Department of Pathology and  Anatomical Sciences at the MU School of Medicine, and William Kimbel and  Donald Johanson, director and founding director of the Institute of  Human Origins at Arizona State University, studied a 3.2  million-year-old fourth metatarsal of Australopithecus afarensis. A team  from the Institute of Human Origins and National Museum of Ethiopia led  by Kimbel discovered the fossil in Hadar, Ethiopia. The species is  often referred to as "Lucy," the nickname of the most complete fossil  skeleton of the species to be discovered.
The foot bone suggests that these hominids had stiff, arched feet,  similar to humans. Australopithecus afarensis had smaller brains and  stronger jaws than humans, and scientists have known the animals walked  upright on two feet. However, researchers have not known whether Lucy  and her kin were more versatile creatures than humans and spent time  climbing through the trees.
"Now that we know Lucy and her relatives had arches in their feet,  this affects much of we know about them, from where they lived to what  they ate and how they avoided predators," said Ward, professor of  integrative anatomy. "The development of arched feet was a fundamental  shift toward the human condition, because it meant giving up the ability  to use the big toe for grasping branches, signaling that our ancestors  had finally abandoned life in the trees in favor of life on the ground."
With human-like arches in its feet, Australopithecus afarensis was  able to roam the countryside and leave the forest to forage for food  when necessary. With its strong jaws, Australopithecus also could eat  several types of food, including fruit, seeds, nuts and roots. Combining  their strong jaws and their new skill of walking, Lucy and her  relatives were able to live in open areas as well as wooded ones.
Australopithecus was a new kind of hominin, fundamentally different  from earlier species like Ardipithecus ramidus, which preceded Lucy and  was not committed to walking upright on the ground. Instead,  Ardipithecus ramidus moved on all four feet or upright depending on the  situation, and had powerful grasping feet.
"Arches in the feet are a key component of human-like walking  because they absorb shock and also provide a stiff platform so that we  can push off from our feet and move forward," Ward said. "People today  with 'flat feet' who lack arches have a host of joint problems  throughout their skeletons. Understanding that the arch appeared very  early in our evolution shows that the unique structure of our feet is  fundamental to human locomotion. If we can understand what we were  designed to do and the natural selection that shaped the human skeleton,  we can gain insight into how our skeletons work today. Arches in our  feet were just as important for our ancestors as they are for us."
"This fourth metatarsal is the only one known of A. afarensis and is a  key piece of evidence for the early evolution of the uniquely human way  of walking," Kimbel said. "The ongoing work at Hadar is producing rare  parts of the skeleton that are absolutely critical for understanding how  our species evolved."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6692</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:35:45 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Death in the bat caves: UC Davis experts call for action against fast-moving disease</title><description>A team of wildlife experts led by UC Davis called today for a  national fight against a new fungus that has killed more than 1 million  bats in the eastern United States and is spreading fast throughout North  America.
"If we lose bats, we lose keystone species in some communities,  predators that consume enormous numbers of insects, and beautiful  wildlife species that are important parts of North America's  biodiversity," said Janet Foley, a UC Davis professor of veterinary  medicine at the Center for Vectorborne Diseases.
Foley and her co-authors' call to action appears today online in the Early View section of the journal &lt;em&gt;Conservation Biology&lt;/em&gt;.
Bats are essential members of natural ecosystems, hunting insects,  pollinating plants and scattering seeds, Foley said. "Bats do the jobs  at night that birds do during the day. But because they are most active  in darkness, few people are aware of how many bats live around us and  how valuable they are."
The new fungal disease has been named "white-nose syndrome."  Scientists think the fungus, which normally lives in soil, somehow  traveled to cave walls where bats hibernate in winter and began  infecting the animals' facial skin and wing membranes.
Sick bats appear to be coated with frost. They fly more than normal,  which uses up fat reserves, and also lose water at a faster rate than  normal. Disoriented, they move to exposed places, such as cave  entrances.
Eventually, they starve, freeze or die of dehydration.
The first infected bats were found by a cave explorer near Albany,  N.Y., in February 2006. Since then, infected bats have been found  northward to Ontario and Quebec in Canada, south to Tennessee and west  to Oklahoma. The authors write that they expect white-nose syndrome to  cross the Rocky Mountains and enter California in the next several  years.
There are 23 species of bats in California that hibernate in caves, and so are vulnerable to white-nose syndrome.
Foley said the fungus does not appear to be a threat to people or animals other than bats.
The National Wildlife Health Center, a program of the U.S. Geological  Survey, identified the white-nose fungus, Geomyces destructans, in  2007.
"In the three years since its discovery, white-nose syndrome has  changed the focus of bat conservation in North America," said Foley. "A  national response is required, and our epidemiological roadmap is  designed to help emerging state and national plans to combat white-nose  syndrome across the United States."
Foley and her collaborators developed their recommendations at a  workshop in Colorado in August funded by the National Park Service.
The authors' recommendations include: an outbreak investigation  network that would establish a standard diagnosis and case definitions;  bat population monitoring; and improved public awareness of the problem.  "Scientists, policy makers and members of the public will all have a  voice in the coming debate over the best course of action," Foley said.  They also call for further studies of chemical and biological agents  known to kill the fungus but not yet proven safe for bats, as well as  study of treatments for similar diseases.
&amp;nbsp;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6628</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 03:25:03 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Newly discovered dinosaur likely father of Triceratops</title><description>&lt;em&gt;Triceratops&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Torosaurus&lt;/em&gt; have long been considered  the kings of the horned dinosaurs. But a new discovery traces the  giants' family tree further back in time, when a newly discovered  species appears to have reigned long before its more well-known  descendants, making it the earliest known member of its family.
The new species, called &lt;em&gt;Titanoceratops&lt;/em&gt; after the Greek myth of the Titans, rivaled &lt;em&gt;Triceratops&lt;/em&gt; in size, with an estimated weight of nearly 15,000 pounds and a massive eight-foot-long skull.
&lt;em&gt;Titanoceratops&lt;/em&gt;, which lived in the American southwest during  the late Cretaceous period around 74 million years ago, is the earliest  known triceratopsin, suggesting the group evolved its large size more  than five million years earlier than previously thought, according to  Nicholas Longrich, the paleontologist at Yale who made the discovery.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://www.opa.yale.edu/news/article.aspx?id=8210" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6601</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:19:22 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gene 'relocation' key to most evolutionary change in bacteria</title><description>In a new study, scientists at the University of Maryland and the  Institut Pasteur show that bacteria evolve new abilities, such as  antibiotic resistance, predominantly by acquiring genes from other  bacteria.
The researchers new insights into the evolution of bacteria partly  contradict the widely accepted theory that new biological functions in  bacteria and other  microbes arise primarily through the process of gene  duplication within the same organism. Their just released study will be  published in the open-access journal &lt;em&gt;PLoS Genetics&lt;/em&gt; on January 27.
Microbes live and thrive in incredibly diverse and harsh conditions,  from boiling or freezing water to the human immune system. This  remarkable adaptability results from their ability to quickly modify  their repertoire of protein functions by gaining, losing and modifying  their genes. Microbes were known to modify genes to expand their  repertoire of protein families in two ways: via duplication processes  followed by slow functional specialization, in the same way as large  multicellular organisms like us, and by acquiring different genes  directly from other microbes. The latter process, known as horizontal  gene transfer, is notoriously conspicuous in the spread of antibiotic  resistance, turning some bacteria into drug-resistant 'superbugs' such  as MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), a serious public  health concern.
The researchers examined a large database of microbial genomes,  including some of the most virulent human pathogens, to discover whether  duplication or horizontal gene transfer was the most common expansion  method. Their study shows that gene family expansion can indeed follow  both routes, but unlike in large multicellular organisms, it  predominantly takes place by horizontal transfer.
First author Todd Treangen, a postdoctoral researcher in the  University of Maryland Center for Bioinformatics and Computational  Biology and co-author Eduardo P. C. Rocha of the Institut Pasteur  conclude that because microbes invented the majority of life's  biochemical diversity -- from respiration to photosynthesis --, "the  study of the evolution of biology systems should explicitly account for  the predominant role of horizontal gene transfer in the diversification  of protein families."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6587</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:29:08 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Altered gene protects some African-Americans from coronary artery disease</title><description>A team of scientists at Johns Hopkins and elsewhere has discovered  that a single alteration in the genetic code of about a fourth of  African-Americans helps protect them from coronary artery disease, the  leading cause of death in Americans of all races.
Researchers found that a single DNA variation - having at least one  so-called guanine nucleotide in a base pair instead of a combination  without any guanine - on a gene already linked to higher risk of  coronary disease in other races is linked in blacks to decreased risk.    Specifically, the study showed that otherwise healthy African-American  men and women with the alternative genetic code had a fivefold reduction  in the likelihood that their arteries would narrow or clog.
For African-Americans who inherited two copies of the guanine gene  variant, one from each parent, the risk reduction was even more  dramatic. They were 10 times less likely to have coronary heart disease,  which disproportionately afflicts a greater number of African-Americans  than whites or any other ethnic group.  Nearly 17 million Americans  have an arterial problem plaguing the heart, causing a half-million  deaths, annually.
"What we think we have here is the first confirmed hereditary link  to cardiovascular disease among African-Americans and it is a protective  one," says senior study investigator and health epidemiologist Diane  Becker, M.P.H., Sc.D.  "This newly found link in  African-Americans was  not only protective instead of harmful but was also found at a precise  location on gene CDKN2B, a gene close to the single base pair  modification tied to other increased risk of coronary artery disease in  other races."
Becker emphasizes that only an estimated quarter of blacks have the  protective CDKN2B code, and only 6 percent have two copies, so "while a  lot of African-Americans have this protective genetic modification, most  do not." Advance testing for the genetic marker, she says, could  ultimately in the future assist physicians in risk-stratifying those  without inherited protection so they could be monitored more closely for  early signs and symptoms of disease.
The findings are set to appear in the &lt;em&gt;Journal of Human Genetics&lt;/em&gt; online Jan. 27.
Becker, a professor at both the Johns Hopkins University School of  Medicine and Hopkins' Bloomberg School of Public Health, and a team that  included researchers at Duke and Emory universities, also say their  results, based on blood analysis from 548 black men and women in the  Baltimore region and confirmed in several hundred more in the Atlanta  and Durham, N.C., regions, help explain why earlier studies found  potentially dangerous genetic connections to this type of heart disease  in Caucasians, Hispanics and Asians, but failed to find a negative  tie-in to the disease in blacks.
Earlier studies, says Becker, had involved genome-wide reviews in  multiracial populations and taken "a needle in the haystack approach" to  finding that one change in a string of some 58,000 base pairs, in a  chromosomal region known as 9p21.  That region, which includes CDKN2B,  is associated with higher rates of coronary disease in non-blacks.
The team's latest analysis was successful, she believes, because it  had a large and sufficiently broadly based black volunteer population.   The study group comprised men and women between the ages of 26 and 60.   Investigators also focused on the 9p21 region and a subsection of  genetic material within called ANRIL that overlaps and is closely held  to CDKN2B, but away from the deleterious genetic variant found earlier.
Johns Hopkins cardiologist Brian Kral, M.D., M.P.H., says the  abundance of activity in this particular region of the genome, including  CDK2NB and ANRIL, suggests that everyday replication of this zone could  play a more fundamental, underlying role in the progression of coronary  artery disease in all races.
Kral, an assistant professor at Johns Hopkins and its Heart and  Vascular Institute. was co-lead investigator of the latest study, along  with Hopkins genetic epidemiologist Rasika Mathias, Sc.D.  The team next  plans to further investigate the ANRIL subregion of 9p21 to see if any  single genetic changes speed up or slow down progression of coronary  diseases.
Blood samples for the genetic analysis came from a larger study  being led by Becker of some 4,000 people from white and African-American  ethnic backgrounds.  Called the Genetic Study of Atherosclerosis Risk  (GeneSTAR), under way at Johns Hopkins since 1983, it involves  participants who were all healthy upon enrollment, with no existing  symptoms of heart disease.  All were monitored for at least five years  with periodic check-ups to see who developed heart disease and who did  not.  Each had a sibling or a parent who had a history of coronary  artery disease or some other symptom of blocked arteries, such as chest  pain or shortness of breath.  The latest study was based on results  collected through 2007, by which time 35 black study participants had  suffered some form of heart attack or needed an angioplasty or X-ray  scan of the heart's blood vessels to confirm or rule out arterial  blockages.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6582</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:21:22 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Test shows dinosaurs survived mass extinction by 700,000 years</title><description>University of Alberta researchers determined that a fossilized  dinosaur bone found in New Mexico confounds the long established  paradigm that the age of dinosaurs ended between 65.5 and 66 million  years ago.
The U of A team, led by Larry Heaman from the Department of Earth  and Atmospheric Sciences, determined the femur bone of a hadrosaur as  being only 64.8 million years old. That means this particular plant  eater was alive about 700,000 years after the mass extinction event many  paleontologists believe wiped all non-avian dinosaurs off the face of  earth, forever.
Heaman and colleagues used a new direct-dating method called U-Pb  (uranium-lead) dating. A laser beam unseats minute particles of the  fossil, which then undergo isotopic analysis. This new technique not  only allows the age of fossil bone to be determined but potentially can  distinguish the type of food a dinosaur eats. Living bone contains very  low levels of uranium but during fossilization (typically less than 1000  years after death) bone is enriched in elements like uranium. The  uranium atoms in bone decay spontaneously to lead over time and once  fossilization is complete the uranium-lead clock starts ticking. The  isotopic composition of lead determined in the hadrosaur's femur bone is  therefore a measure of its absolute age.
Currently, paleontologists date dinosaur fossils using a technique  called relative chronology. Where possible, a fossil's age is estimated  relative to the known depositional age of a layer of sediment in which  it was found or constrained by the known depositional ages of layers  above and below the fossil-bearing horizon. However, obtaining accurate  depositional ages for sedimentary rocks is very difficult and as a  consequence the depositional age of most fossil horizons is poorly  constrained. A potential weakness for the relative chronology approach  is that over millions of years geologic and environmental forces may  cause erosion of a fossil-bearing horizon and therefore a fossil can  drift or migrate from its original layer in the strata. The researchers  say their direct-dating method precludes the reworking process.
It's widely believed that a mass extinction of the dinosaurs  happened between 65.5 and 66 million years ago. It's commonly believed  debris from a giant meteorite impact blocked out the Sun, causing  extreme climate conditions and killing vegetation worldwide.
Heaman and his research colleagues say there could be several  reasons why the New Mexico hadrosaur came from a line of dinosaurs that  survived the great mass extinction events of the late Cretaceous period  (KT extinction event). Heaman says it's possible that in some areas the  vegetation wasn't wiped out and a number of the hadrosaur species  survived. The researchers also say the potential survival of dinosaur  eggs during extreme climatic conditions needs to be explored.
Heaman and his colleagues believe if their new uranium-lead dating  technique bears out on more fossil samples then the KT extinction  paradigm and the end of the dinosaurs will have to be revised.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6581</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:19:48 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ancient body clock discovered that helps to keep all living things on time</title><description>The mechanism that controls the internal 24-hour clock of all forms  of life from human cells to algae has been identified by scientists.
Not only does the research provide important insight into  health-related problems linked to individuals with disrupted clocks &amp;ndash;  such as pilots and shift workers &amp;ndash; it also indicates that the 24-hour  circadian clock found in human cells is the same as that found in algae  and dates back millions of years to early life on Earth.
Two new studies out today in the journal &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt; from the  Universities of Cambridge and Edinburgh give insight into the circadian  clock which controls patterns of daily and seasonal activity, from sleep  cycles to butterfly migrations to flower opening.
One study, from the University of Cambridge's Institute of Metabolic  Science, has for the first time identified 24-hour rhythms in red blood  cells.  This is significant because circadian rhythms have always been  assumed to be linked to DNA and gene activity, but &amp;ndash; unlike most of the  other cells in the body &amp;ndash; red blood cells do not have DNA.
Akhilesh Reddy, from the University of Cambridge and lead author of  the study, said: "We know that clocks exist in all our cells; they're  hard-wired into the cell. Imagine what we'd be like without a clock to  guide us through our days. The cell would be in the same position if it  didn't have a clock to coordinate its daily activities.
"The implications of this for health are manifold. We already know  that disrupted clocks &amp;ndash; for example, caused by shift-work and jet-lag &amp;ndash;  are associated with metabolic disorders such as diabetes, mental health  problems and even cancer. By furthering our knowledge of how the 24-hour  clock in cells works, we hope that the links to these disorders &amp;ndash; and  others &amp;ndash; will be made clearer. This will, in the longer term, lead to  new therapies that we couldn't even have thought about a couple of years  ago."
For the study, the scientists, funded by the Wellcome Trust,  incubated purified red blood cells from healthy volunteers in the dark  and at body temperature, and sampled them at regular intervals for  several days. They then examined the levels of biochemical markers &amp;ndash;  proteins called peroxiredoxins &amp;ndash; that are produced in high levels in  blood and found that they underwent a 24-hour cycle. Peroxiredoxins are  found in virtually all known organisms.
A further study, by scientists working together at the Universities  of Edinburgh and Cambridge, and the Observatoire Oceanologique in  Banyuls, France, found a similar 24-hour cycle in marine algae,  indicating that internal body clocks have always been important, even  for ancient forms of life.
The researchers in this study found the rhythms by sampling the  peroxiredoxins in algae at regular intervals over several days. When the  algae were kept in darkness, their DNA was no longer active, but the  algae kept their circadian clocks ticking without active genes.  Scientists had thought that the circadian clock was driven by gene  activity, but both the algae and the red blood cells kept time without  it.
Andrew Millar of the University of Edinburgh's School of Biological  Sciences, who led the study, said: "This groundbreaking research shows  that body clocks are ancient mechanisms that have stayed with us through  a billion years of evolution. They must be far more important and  sophisticated than we previously realised. More work is needed to  determine how and why these clocks developed in people &amp;ndash; and most likely  all other living things on earth &amp;ndash; and what role they play in  controlling our bodies."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6573</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:23:27 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>With cloud computing, the mathematics of evolution may get easier to learn</title><description>An innovative, educational computing platform developed by University  at Buffalo faculty members and hosted by the cloud (remote,  high-capacity, scalable servers) is helping UB students understand parts  of evolutionary biology on an entirely new level. Soon, high-school and  middle-school students will benefit from the same tool as well.
Pop! World, developed by UB faculty members with a $250,000  National Science Foundation grant, takes advantage of cloud computing,  which allows programs to run on remote servers instead of through  departmental or institutional servers. That feature allows  resource-intensive programs to serve many users regardless of their  physical location without sacrificing speed or quality of service.
"The cloud serves as a way to distribute resources for free  without limits on how many people can access it and with no regard to  what kind of computer you are downloading to," says Jessica Poulin, PhD,  research assistant professor in the Department of Biological Sciences  in the College of Arts and Sciences, who developed Pop! World with  principal investigator Bina Ramamurthy, PhD, research associate  professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering in the  School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, and Katharina Dittmar, PhD,  assistant professor of biological sciences. "Everybody can get there."
UB faculty members designed Pop! World because they wanted to  get college students more excited about population genetics; they also  wanted to maintain the university's unique freshman lab requirements at a  time when resources are growing more scarce.
UB is one of the few universities in the U.S. that encourages  freshmen interested in biology to begin experiencing labs during their  first semester on campus.
"We put our freshmen right into labs because students who might  otherwise be lost from the major are captivated when they get to do  science," Poulin says. "When you sit in a lecture hall with 400 people  and someone is talking about flatworms, what do you care? Despite the  logistical difficulties, and the intense demands on staff time, we think  that getting freshmen into labs is one of our department's great  strengths. We didn't want to discontinue it."
At the same time, Poulin says that it is difficult to convey the  main concepts of population genetics at this level, particularly those  that are mathematically demanding.
Hired in 2008 to revamp UB's evolutionary biology curriculum for  Bio 200, Poulin says that the department was seeking ways to maintain  and improve the course and the lab for students without requiring  additional resources, such as teaching assistants.
"Almost all of evolutionary theory can be mathematically modeled  if you know enough information to begin with," she says. "If you enter  the correct parameters into the computer, the computer will tell you  what will happen after one generation or a thousand generations. I  wanted students to be exposed to something that made them feel they were  actually watching evolution happen. I wanted it to be captivating."
While some computational tools exist to help students with  population genetics -- the mathematical analysis of evolution -- the  result is often nothing more dramatic than a line graph.
"Our students grew up in the Internet age surrounded by MP3  players, wireless phones and social networking apps," says Ramamurthy,  "so the visual aspects of Pop! World are certainly very appealing to  them."
The UB team programmed Pop! World in Adobe Flash, which lends a  highly visual, nearly tactile look to the program. While the current  version illustrates evolution with red and green lizards, it is highly  adaptable, so it can be used with any population of organisms. It also  is highly scalable, so that it can be made more complex, to serve the  needs of population genetics researchers, or less complex, to serve the  needs of middle- and high-school students.
A preliminary version of Pop! World is running on the Google App Engine Cloud. It can be accessed by going to http://popworld15.appspot.com/.
With the help of the NSF grant, the UB team is now creating a  sophisticated version of the tool, expected to be available by Fall  2011.
"Our idea was to use general principles of population genetics  not only to convey the principle in the context of evolutionary biology  but to make sure that students understand visually what's happening with  the mathematics behind it," explains Dittmar.
When an early version of Pop! World was used to teach  evolutionary biology last summer, students and teaching assistants  responded enthusiastically.
"The TAs loved it because it facilitated their explanations of a very complicated problem," Poulin says.
"Pop! World gives students the visual background they need to  understand complex mathematical problems," Dittmar adds. "And it works  kind of like a video game, which serves the current population of  undergrads well."
That visual appeal is also expected to go far with middle-school  and high-school biology students, groups the UB team hopes to excite  about evolution; by spring, they expect to have completed a modified  version for them as well.
By making evolutionary biology more visually appealing and, thus,  more accessible, Poulin hopes that Pop! World will make evolution  itself a more appealing subject for secondary schools to teach.
"There's a huge disconnect," she says. "The universities all  accept evolution as fact. It's not a question. But many high schools and  middle schools don't want to touch it. They don't want to deal with the  politics of it."
Her hope is that the visual and educational appeal of Pop! World and the ease of using it will begin to change that situation.
The UB team's grant, "A Cloud-enabled Evolutionary Genetics  Learning Tool for Engaging the Cyber-savvy Generation" (NSF OCI CI-Team  1041280) from the NSF's Office of Cyberinfrastructure, will run for two  years.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6542</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:56:40 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Inventions of evolution: What gives frogs a face</title><description>&amp;ldquo;Don't be a frog!&amp;ldquo; people say in jest when someone hesitates instead of  acting straight away. However to be called a frog should actually be a  reason to strengthen one's self-confidence. After all frogs are real  winners &amp;ndash; at least from the point of view of evolutionary biology:  Nearly 6.000 species are known today. &amp;ldquo;In terms of numbers frogs are  superior to all the other amphibians, and even mammals&amp;ldquo;, says Professor  Dr. Lennart Olsson from the Friedrich Schiller University Jena  (Germany). Professor Olsson's research group for Systematic Zoology  examines these animals&amp;rsquo;s special secret of success. &amp;ldquo;We are interested  in how the frogs developed in such a great variety and which  evolutionary new development is responsible for making frogs so  particularly successful&amp;ldquo;, Jennifer Schmidt from Olsson's team explains........&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://idw-online.de/de/news404172" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6493</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:33:21 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Punctuated evolution in cancer genomes</title><description>Remarkable new research overthrows the conventional view that cancer  always develops in a steady, stepwise progression. It shows that in some  cancers, the genome can be shattered into hundreds of fragments in a  single cellular catastrophe, wreaking mutation on a massive scale.
The scars of this chromosomal crisis are seen in cases from across  all the common cancer types, accounting for at least one in forty of all  cancers. The phenomenon is particularly common in bone cancers, where  the distinctively ravaged genome is seen in up to one in four cases.
The team looked at structural changes in the genomes of cancer  samples using advanced DNA sequencing technologies. In some cases, they  found dramatic structural changes affecting highly localised regions of  one or a handful of chromosomes that could not be explained using  standard models of DNA damage.
"The results astounded us," says Dr Peter Campbell, from the Cancer  Genome Project at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and senior author  on the paper. "It seems that in a single cell in a single event, one or  more chromosomes basically explode &amp;ndash; literally into hundreds of  fragments.
"In some instances &amp;ndash; the cancer cases &amp;ndash; our DNA repair machinery  tries to stick the chromosomes back together but gets it disastrously  wrong. Out of the hundreds of mutations that result, several promote the  development of cancer."
Cancer is typically viewed as a gradual evolution, taking years to  accumulate the multiple mutations required to drive the cancer's  aggressive growth. Many cancers go through phases of abnormal tissue  growth before eventually developing into malignant tumours.
The new results add an important new insight, a new process that  must be included in our consideration of cancer genome biology. In some  cancers, a chromosomal crisis can generate multiple cancer-causing  mutations in a single event.
"We suspect catastrophes such as this might happen occasionally in  the cells of our body," says Dr Andy Futreal, Head of Cancer Genetics  and Genomics at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and an author on the  paper. "The cells have to make a decision &amp;ndash; to repair or to give up the  ghost.
"Most often, the cell gives up, but sometimes the repair machinery  sticks bits of genome back together as best it can. This produces a  fractured genome riddled with mutations which may well have taken a  considerable leap along the road to cancer."
The new genome explosions caused 239 rearrangements on a single chromosome in one case of colorectal cancer.
The damage was particularly common in bone cancers, where it  affected five of twenty samples. In one of these samples the team found  three cancer genes that they believe were mutated in a single event: all  three are genes that normally suppress cancer development and when  deleted or mutated can lead to increased cancer development.
"The evidence suggests that a single cellular crisis shatters a  chromosome or chromosomes," says Professor Mike Stratton, Director of  the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and an author on the paper, "and  that the DNA repair machinery pastes them back together in a highly  erroneous order.
"It is remarkable that, not only can a cell survive this crisis, it  can emerge with a genomic landscape that confers a selective advantage  on the clone, promoting evolution towards cancer."
The team propose two possible causes of the damage they see. First,  they suggest it might occur during cell division, when chromosomes are  packed into a condensed form. Ionizing radiation can cause breaks like  those seen. The second proposition is that attrition of telomeres &amp;ndash; the  specialized genome sequences at the tips of chromosomes &amp;ndash; causes genome  instability at cell division.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6432</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 03:26:16 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>What triggers mass extinctions? Study shows how invasive species stop new life</title><description>An influx of invasive species can stop the dominant natural process  of new species formation and trigger mass extinction events, according  to research results published today in the journal &lt;em&gt;PLoS ONE&lt;/em&gt;.
The  study of the collapse of Earth's marine life 378 to 375 million years  ago suggests that the planet's current ecosystems, which are struggling  with biodiversity loss, could meet a similar fate.
Although Earth  has experienced five major mass extinction events, the environmental  crash during the Late Devonian was unlike any other in the planet's  history.
The actual number of extinctions wasn't higher than the natural rate of species loss, but very few new species arose.
"We  refer to the Late Devonian as a mass extinction, but it was actually a  biodiversity crisis," said Alycia Stigall, a scientist at Ohio  University and author of the &lt;em&gt;PLoS ONE&lt;/em&gt; paper........&amp;gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=118292&amp;amp;org=NSF&amp;amp;from=news" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6391</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 03:16:55 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>SU scientists find that in the evolutionary mating game, brawn and stealth rule</title><description>When prowling for a hook up, it's not always the good-looker who gets  the girl. In fact, in a certain species of South American fish, brawn  and stealth beat out colorful and refined almost every time.
In a series of published studies of a South American species of fish (&lt;em&gt;Poecilia parae&lt;/em&gt;),  which are closely related to guppies, Syracuse University scientists  have discovered how the interplay between male mating strategies and  predator behavior has helped preserve the population's distinctive color  diversity over the course of time.  The third study in the series was  published Dec. 23 in &lt;em&gt;BMC Evolutionary Biology,&lt;/em&gt; a publication of  BioMed Central, London.  The studies were supported in part by grants  from the National Science Foundation (NSF).
"Poecilia parae are an ideal model for investigating how genetic  diversity originates and is maintained within a species," says study  author Jorge Luis Hurtado-Gonzales, a Ph.D. candidate in the Department  of Biology in SU's College of Arts and Sciences. "The findings may help  us better understand how to protect biodiversity in larger ecosystems."  Hurtado-Gonzales' co-author is J. Albert C. Uy of the University of  Miami.
Like guppies, Poecilia parae sexually reproduce and their offspring  are born live.  Unlike guppies, in which no two males have exactly the  same color patterns, Poecilia parae males come in five, genetically  determined colors&amp;mdash;red, yellow, blue, parae (clear with a black stripe),  and immaculata (drab gray that mimics the color of immature females).   When found in the wild, the abundance of each color group represented in  the total population is relatively constant despite the fact that  females prefer to mate with the more striking reds and yellows.
"If females prefer red and yellow males, then one would think that  red and yellow would dominate and the other colors would phase out over  time," Hurtado-Gonzales says. "However, red and yellow are the rarest  colors found in the wild."
The most recent study in BMC Evolutionary Biology found that while  females prefer reds and yellows they go for the winner of fin-to-fin  combat in a significant number of cases.  In the study, the larger parae  almost always prevailed, thus gaining a mating advantage despite its  less-than-desirable coloration.  Immaculatas, which are the smallest  males, generally shunned the showy displays of violence and were mostly  ignored by all but yellow males.  The larger yellows almost always  defeated immaculatas, stopping them from approaching females.
"In the absence of male-to-male competition, we found that females  will almost always choose a red male," Hurtado-Gonzales says. "However,  if the red loses a fight, the female will generally seek out the winner.  In most cases, that is the larger parae, which is the most dominant  male."
Immaculatas compensate for their lack of physical prowess and  attractiveness through a mating strategy that relies on stealth. In a  2009 study published in the journal Animal Behavior, Hurtado-Gonzales  found that the immaculatas' drab color provides camouflage that enables  them to stealthy mate with females while the more colorful red males  were wooing them.  Females are promiscuous and will mate with multiple  males. Additionally, immaculatas have developed larger testes, which  produce more sperm, providing a post-mating advantage in the race to  fertilize female eggs.
Finally, in a study published earlier this year in the Journal of  Evolutionary Biology, produced by the European Society for Evolutionary  Biology, Hurtado-Gonzales found that a common predator of Poecilia parae  prefers to dine on reds and yellows, most likely because their striking  colors make them easier to see. This predatory disadvantage contributes  to the lower numbers of reds and yellows in the overall population.
"It seems that within an evolutionary scale, the less attractive  males persist in the population over their more attractive counterparts  by evolving unique, but likely equally effective mating strategies,"  Hurtado-Gonzales says. "Therefore, the maintenance of multiple colors  may result from the interaction between predator control of attractive  males (reds and yellows) and the ability of less attractive males to  exploit other areas of sexual selection, including male dominance, sneak  behavior, and sperm competition."
A forthcoming study will focus on how blue males gain a mating  advantage. Early results indicate that blues exploit habitats in which  blue light waves maximize their attractiveness to females and possibly  limit their vulnerability to predators.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6361</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:12:17 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Genome of extinct Siberian human sheds new light on modern human origins</title><description>The sequencing of the nuclear genome from an ancient finger bone  found in a Siberian cave shows that the cave dwellers were neither  Neandertals nor modern humans.
An international team of researchers led by Svante P&amp;auml;&amp;auml;bo of the Max  Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig (Germany) has  sequenced the nuclear genome from a finger bone of an extinct hominin  that is at least 30,000 years old and was excavated by archaeologists  from the Russian Academy of Sciences in Denisova Cave in southern  Siberia, Russia, in 2008. A team at Harvard Medical School led the  population-genetics analysis.
These findings are published in the December 23 issue of &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;.
Earlier this year Svante P&amp;auml;&amp;auml;bo and his colleagues showed that the  mitochondrial DNA from the finger bone displayed an unusual sequence  suggesting that it came from an unknown ancient hominin form. Now, using  techniques the researchers developed to sequence the Neandertal genome  earlier this year, they have sequenced the nuclear genome from the bone.
The researchers found that the individual was female and came from a  group of hominins that shared an ancient origin with Neandertals, but  subsequently diverged. They call this group of hominins Denisovans.  Unlike Neandertals, Denisovans did not contribute genes to all  present-day Eurasians. However, Denisovans share an elevated number of  genetic variants with modern-day Papua New Guinean populations,  suggesting that there was interbreeding between Denisovans and the  ancestors of Melanesians.
In addition, a Denisovan tooth found in the same cave shows a  morphology that is distinct from Neandertals and modern humans and  resembles much older hominin forms. Bence Viola, a scientist at the Max  Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology comments, "The tooth is  just amazing. It allows us to connect the morphological and genetic  information."
David Reich, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School who  led the population genetic analysis, says, "The fact that Denisovans  were discovered in Southern Siberia but contributed genetic material to  modern human populations from New Guinea suggests that Denisovans may  have been widespread in Asia during the Late Pleistocene."
According to Svante P&amp;auml;&amp;auml;bo of the Max Planck Institute of  Evolutionary Anthropology, "In combination with the Neandertal genome  sequence, the Denisovan genome suggests a complex picture of genetic  interactions between our ancestors and different ancient hominin  groups."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6354</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:26:33 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Without intervention, Mariana crow to become extinct in 75 years</title><description>Researchers from the University of Washington say the Mariana crow, a  forest crow living on Rota Island in the western Pacific Ocean, will go  extinct in 75 years.
The extinction could happen almost twice as soon as previously believed.
The crow's extinction can be prevented with a bird management  program that focuses on helping fledgling birds reach their first  birthday, said James Ha, UW research associate professor in psychology.
Ha examined survival rates in 97 Mariana crows &amp;ndash; &lt;em&gt;Corvus kubaryi&lt;/em&gt; &amp;ndash; that had been tracked between 1990 and 2010 by researchers. He found  that 40 percent of fledgling crows made it to their first birthday.
The rapid decline of young birds is twice what researchers previously estimated.
"It's the first year of survival that's the most crucial," said Ha,  lead author of a report on the research. "If only 40 percent of  fledglings survive their first year, then we predict the species will go  extinct in 75 years."
Ha and his co-authors published the report in the current issue of &lt;em&gt;Bird Conservation International&lt;/em&gt;.
The 75-year extinction estimate is according to a population model  that factors in the estimated number of existing Mariana crows &amp;ndash; 330 &amp;ndash;  with the 40 percent first-year survival rate, average number of  fledglings per nest and fertility of female birds. Using this model, Ha  found that 91 birds would exist in 20 years and that in 75 years the  species would be extinct.
Previously, biologists believed that the first-year survival rate of Mariana crows was higher, around 60 to 80 percent.
When Ha used those estimates in his population model, the outlook was  not as grim for the birds. At 60 percent first-year survival rate,  Mariana crows would dwindle to 218 birds in 20 years and become extinct  in 133 years. And an 80 percent first-year survival rate projects that  in 20 years there would be 453 birds, a growing population that would  avoid extinction.
"According to the population model, if we can boost fledgling  survival from 40 percent to 70 percent, the Mariana crows will be fine,"  Ha said.
Of the about 35 crow species, Mariana crows are considered rare and  classified as critically endangered. Weighing about a half of a pound,  Mariana crows are 40 percent smaller than other crows, such as the  Northwest crow.
Monogamously-mating, Mariana crows live exclusively on Rota Island,  populated by about 1,200 people and located 56 miles northeast of Guam.  Rota is a U.S. territory and is up for consideration as a U.S. national  park.
Ha and Renee Ha, co-author of the report and UW research scientist  in psychology, fear that Rota faces the same avian demise as Guam, which  has no forest birds.
Brown tree snakes introduced to the island after World War II wiped  out native birds, such as the Guam flycatcher and the Rufous fantail.
The Has suspect that the uncontrolled increase of feral cats on Rota  is leading to the decrease of Mariana crows, much like brown tree snakes  led to the disappearance of forest birds on Guam.
The researchers say that a captive rearing program could save the  Mariana crows. They hope to set up a rearing facility where they could  incubate eggs from the wild, raise the fledglings until their first  birthday and then release the grown birds into nesting sites on the  island.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6334</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:32:07 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Research shows that environmental factors limit species diversity</title><description>It's long been accepted by biologists that environmental factors  cause the diversity&amp;mdash;or number&amp;mdash;of species to increase before eventually  leveling off. Some recent work, however, has suggested that species  diversity continues instead of entering into a state of equilibrium. But  new research on lizards in the Caribbean not only supports the original  theory that finite space, limited food supplies, and competition for  resources all work together to achieve equilibrium; it builds on the  theory by extending it over a much longer timespan.
The research was done by Daniel Rabosky of the University of  California, Berkeley and Richard Glor of the University of Rochester who  studied patterns of species accumulation of lizards over millions of  years on the four Caribbean islands of Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Hispaniola,  and Cuba. Their paper is being published December 21 in the journal, &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt;.
Glor and Rabosky focused on species diversity&amp;mdash;the number of distinct species of lizards&amp;mdash;not the number of individual lizards.
"Geographic size correlates to diversity," said Glor. "In general,  the larger the area, the greater the number of species that can be  supported. For example, there are 60 species of Anolis lizards on Cuba,  but far fewer species on the much smaller islands of Jamaica and Puerto  Rico." There are only 6 species on Jamaica and 10 on Puerto Rico.
Ecologists Robert MacArthur of Princeton University and E.O. Wilson  of Harvard University established the theory of island biogeography in  the 1960s to explain the diversity and richness of species in restricted  habitats, as well as the limits on the growth in number of species.  Glor said the MacArthur-Wilson theory was developed for ecological  time-scales, which encompass thousands of years, while his work with  Rabosky extends the concepts over a million years. "MacArthur and Wilson  recognized the macroevolutionary implications of their work," explained  Glor, "but focused on ecological time-scales for simplicity."
Historically, biologists needed fossil records to study patterns of  species diversification of lizards on the Caribbean islands. But  advances in molecular methodology allowed Glor and Rabosky to use DNA  sequences to reconstruct evolutionary trees that show the relationships  between species.
The two scientists found that species diversification of lizards on  the four islands reached a plateau millions of years ago and has  essentially come to an end.
Glor said the extent and quality of the data used in the research  allowed him and Rabosky to show that species diversification of lizards  on the islands was not continuing and had indeed entered a state of  equilibrium.
"When we look at other islands and continents that vary in species  richness," said Glor, "we can't just consider rates of accumulation; we  need to look at the plateau points."
Glor emphasizes that a state of equilibrium does not mean that the  evolution of a species comes to an end. Lizards will continue to adapt  to changes in their environment, but they are not expected to develop in  a way that increases the number of species within a habitat.
Glor believes his work with Rabosky represents the "final word" on  the importance of limits on species diversity over the rate of  speciation when explaining the species-area relationship in anole  lizards.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6331</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:21:36 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Scientists decipher 3 billion-year-old genomic fossils</title><description>About 580 million years ago, life on Earth began a rapid period of  change called the Cambrian Explosion, a period defined by the birth of  new life forms over many millions of years that ultimately helped bring  about the modern diversity of animals. Fossils help palaeontologists  chronicle the evolution of life since then, but drawing a picture of  life during the 3 billion years that preceded the Cambrian Period is  challenging, because the soft-bodied Precambrian cells rarely left  fossil imprints. However, those early life forms did leave behind one  abundant microscopic fossil: DNA.
Because all living organisms inherit their genomes from ancestral  genomes, computational biologists at MIT reasoned that they could use  modern-day genomes to reconstruct the evolution of ancient microbes.  They combined information from the ever-growing genome library with  their own mathematical model that takes into account the ways that genes  evolve: new gene families can be born and inherited; genes can be  swapped or horizontally transferred between organisms; genes can be  duplicated in the same genome; and genes can be lost.
The scientists traced thousands of genes from 100 modern genomes  back to those genes' first appearance on Earth to create a genomic  fossil telling not only when genes came into being but also which  ancient microbes possessed those genes. The work suggests that the  collective genome of all life underwent an expansion between 3.3 and 2.8  billion years ago, during which time 27 percent of all presently  existing gene families came into being.
Eric Alm, a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental  Engineering and the Department of Biological Engineering, and Lawrence  David, who recently received his Ph.D. from MIT and is now a Junior  Fellow in the Harvard Society of Fellows, have named this period the  Archean Expansion.
Because so many of the new genes they identified are related to  oxygen, Alm and David first thought that the emergence of oxygen might  be responsible for the Archean Expansion. Oxygen did not exist in the  Earth's atmosphere until about 2.5 billion years ago when it began to  accumulate, likely killing off vast numbers of anerobic life forms in  the Great Oxidation Event.
"The Great Oxidation Event was probably the most catastrophic event  in the history of cellular life, but we don't have any biological record  of it," says Alm.
Closer inspection, however, showed that oxygen-utilizing genes  didn't appear until the tail end of the Archean Expansion 2.8 billion  years ago, which is more consistent with the date geochemists assign to  the Great Oxidation Event.
Instead, Alm and David believe they've detected the birth of modern  electron transport, the biochemical process responsible for shuttling  electrons within cellular membranes. Electron transport is used to  breathe oxygen and by plants and some microbes during photosynthesis  when they harvest energy directly from the sun. A form of photosynthesis  called oxygenic photosynthesis is believed to be responsible for  generating the oxygen associated with the Great Oxidation Event, and is  responsible for the oxygen we breathe today.
The evolution of electron transport during the Archean Expansion  would have enabled several key stages in the history of life, including  photosynthesis and respiration, both of which could lead to much larger  amounts of energy being harvested and stored in the biosphere.
"Our results can't say if the development of electron transport  directly caused the Archean Expansion," says David. "Nonetheless, we can  speculate that having access to a much larger energy budget enabled the  biosphere to host larger and more complex microbial ecosystems."
David and Alm also went on to investigate how microbial genomes  evolved after the Archean Expansion by looking at the metals and  molecules associated with the genes and how those changed in abundance  over time. They found an increasing percentage of genes using oxygen,  and enzymes associated with copper and molybdenum, which is consistent  with the geological record of evolution.
"What is really remarkable about these findings is that they prove  that the histories of very ancient events are recorded in the shared DNA  of living organisms," says Alm. "And now that we are beginning to  understand how to decode that history, I have hope that we can  reconstruct some of the earliest events in the evolution of life in  great detail."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6325</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:31:36 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>What 'pine' cones reveal about the evolution of flowers</title><description>From southern Africa's pineapple lily to Western Australia's swamp  bottlebrush, flowering plants are everywhere.&amp;nbsp; Also called angiosperms,  they make up 90 percent of all land-based, plant life.
New research published this week in the &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/em&gt; provides new insights into their genetic origin, an evolutionary  innovation that quickly gave rise to many diverse flowering plants more  than 130 million years ago.&amp;nbsp;Moreover, a flower with genetic programming  similar to a water lily may have started it all.
"Water lilies and  avocado flowers are essentially 'genetic fossils' still carrying  genetic instructions that would have allowed the transformation of  gymnosperm cones into flowers," said biologist Doug Soltis, co-lead  researcher at the University of Florida in Gainesville.......&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=118227&amp;amp;org=NSF&amp;amp;from=news" target="_blank"&gt;Full story&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6290</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:21:02 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Loss of species large and small threatens human health</title><description>The loss of biodiversity&amp;mdash;from beneficial bacteria to charismatic  mammals&amp;mdash;threatens human health. That's the conclusion of a study  published this week in the journal &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt; by scientists who study biodiversity and infectious diseases.
The work reveals a critical connection between conservation and  disease. Species losses in ecosystems such as forests and fields result  in increases in pathogens&amp;mdash;disease-causing organisms&amp;mdash;the researchers  found.
The animals, plants, and microbes most likely to disappear as  biodiversity is lost are often those that buffer infectious disease  transmission.  Those that remain tend to be species that magnify the  transmission of infectious diseases like West Nile virus, Lyme disease,  and hantavirus.
"We knew of specific cases in which declines in biodiversity  increase the incidence of disease," says Felicia Keesing, an ecologist  at Bard College in Annandale, N.Y., and first author of the paper.  "But  we've learned that the pattern is much more general: biodiversity loss  tends to increase pathogen transmission across a wide range of  infectious disease systems."
The pattern holds true for various types of pathogens&amp;mdash;viruses,  bacteria, fungi&amp;mdash;and for many types of hosts, whether humans, other  animals, or plants.
"When a clinical trial of a drug shows that it works," says Keesing,  "the trial is halted so the drug can be made available.  In a similar  way, the protective effect of biodiversity is clear enough that we need  to implement policies to preserve it now."
In the case of Lyme disease, says co-author Richard Ostfeld of the  Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in Millbrook, N.Y., "strongly  buffering species like the opossum are lost when forests are fragmented,  but white-footed mice thrive.  The mice increase numbers of both the  blacklegged tick vector and the pathogen that causes Lyme disease."
Scientists don't yet know, Ostfeld says, why the most resilient  species&amp;mdash;"the last ones standing when biodiversity is lost"&amp;mdash;are the ones  that also amplify pathogens. Preserving natural habitats, the authors  argue, is the best way to prevent this effect.
Global biodiversity has declined at an unprecedented pace since the  1950s.  Current extinction rates are estimated at 100 to 1,000 times  higher than in past epochs, and are projected to increase at least a  thousand times more in the next 50 years. Expanding human populations  can increase contact with novel pathogens through activities such as  land-clearing for agriculture and hunting for wildlife.
Identifying the variables involved in infectious disease emergence  is difficult but critical, says co-author Andrew Dobson of Princeton  University.
Biodiversity is an important factor, but so are land use changes and  human population growth and behavior, he says.  "When biological  diversity declines and contact with humans increases, you have a perfect  recipe for infectious disease outbreaks."
The authors call for careful monitoring of areas in which large  numbers of domesticated animals are raised or fish are farmed.  "That  would reduce the likelihood of an infectious disease jumping from  wildlife to livestock, then to humans," says Keesing.
For humans and other species to remain healthy, it will take more  than a village&amp;mdash;we need an entire planet, the scientists say, one with  its diversity thriving.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6205</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:22:37 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Study: Ecological effects of biodiversity loss underestimated</title><description>Children aren't the only youngsters who are picky eaters: More than  half of all species are believed to change their diets -- sometimes more  than once -- between birth and adulthood. And a new study by ecologists  at Rice University and the University of California, Santa Barbara,  finds this pattern has major implications for the survival of threatened  species and the stability of natural ecosystems.
With thousands of species facing Earth's sixth major mass  extinction, there is little doubt that the planet's biodiversity is in  rapid decline. But many questions remain about how natural ecosystems  will respond to the lost diversity. The new study, published online this  week in &lt;em&gt;Ecology Letters&lt;/em&gt;, challenges one of the standard  assumptions that ecologists have used for decades to analyze the effects  of biodiversity loss on ecosystems. That assumption -- that all food  resources used by a species are interchangeable among all members of the  species -- fails to account for the fact that diets change as young  animals develop into adults, said Rice ecologist Volker Rudolf, one of  the study's co-authors. The findings by Rudolf and co-author Kevin  Lafferty suggest that changing dietary needs within species have  important implications for ecosystem health.
"If a species has three resources in an ecosystem, and we take away  one, conventional wisdom suggests that that species should be fine,"  said Rudolf, assistant professor in ecology and evolutionary biology.  "But if the missing resource is crucial for a particular developmental  stage of the species, that just doesn't work. You can't take away all of  the adults, for example, or all of the larvae, and assume that the  species will persist."
He said the new study was made possible by a wealth of information  from recent datasets collected by Lafferty and colleagues at UC Santa  Barbara. The datasets cover seven food webs --each representing the  network of connections between dozens and, in some cases, hundreds of  species in an ecosystem. Rudolf said Lafferty's food webs include data  about specific resource requirements for particular developmental stages  within species, in some instances for as many as 50 percent of the  species in the ecosystem.
"With this data, we were able to estimate the percentage of  resources that are actually shared among developmental stages," Rudolf  said. "In addition, we were able to show how this affects the stability  of natural ecosystems.
"We found that in most food webs, the individual stages of a species  typically share less than 50 percent of their resources," he said. "And  within certain subgroups, like metamorphic species, that number is  sometimes less than 10 percent."
The researchers used the information to formulate computer models  that simulated how the loss of species affects natural ecosystems. One  important implication of the finding is that natural ecosystems are much  less stable than previously assumed, and many at-risk species may face  an even greater likelihood of becoming extinct than ecologists  previously thought.
"Our results suggest that the increasing loss of biodiversity -- due  to changing climate, habitat destruction and other causes -- will  likely have much more devastating effects on natural communities and  result in a greater number of species extinctions than previously  believed," Rudolf said.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6190</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 03:19:42 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ancient wind held secret of life and death</title><description>The mystery of how an abundance of fossils have been marvellously  preserved for nearly half a billion years in a remote region of Africa  has been solved by a team of geologists from the University of  Leicester's Department of Geology.
They have established that an ancient wind brought life to the  region &amp;ndash; and was then instrumental in the preservation of the dead.
Sarah Gabbott, Jan Zalasiewicz and colleagues investigated a site  near the Table Mountains in South Africa.  Their findings are published  in the latest issue of the journal &lt;em&gt;Geology&lt;/em&gt;.
Sarah Gabbott said: "Near Table Mountain in South Africa lies one of  the world's most mysterious rock layers.  Just a few metres thick, and  almost half a billion years old, it contains the petrified remains of  bizarre early life-forms, complete with eyes and guts and muscles.
"We investigated why these animals are so marvellously preserved,  when most fossils are just fragments of bone and shell?  The answer  seems to lie in a bitter wind, blowing off a landscape left devastated  by a massive ice-cap."
Gabbott and  Zalasiewicz added that microscopic analysis of the shale  layers using a specially designed 'Petroscope', obtained with funding  from the Royal Society, revealed remarkable and so far unique structures  &amp;ndash; myriads of silt grains, neatly wrapped in the remains of marine  algae.
The authors state: "The silt grains are sedimentary aliens - much  bigger than the marine mud flakes in which they are embedded.  They  could only have been blown by fierce glacial winds on to the sea surface  from that distant landscape.  Arriving thick and fast, they carried  nutrients into the surface waters, fuelling its prolific life.  The deep  waters, though, were overwhelmed by rotting, sinking vegetation,  becoming stagnant and lifeless &amp;ndash; ideal conditions to preserve the animal  remains, down to their finest details.   A cold wind, here, was key to  both life and death."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6183</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:24:31 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Size of mammals exploded after dinosaur extinction</title><description>Researchers demonstrate that the extinction of dinosaurs 65 million  years ago made way for mammals to get bigger - about a thousand times  bigger than they had been. The study, which is published in the  prestigious journal &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;, is the first to show this new pattern of increased body size of mammals after the exit of the dinosaurs.
"Basically, the dinosaurs disappear and all of a sudden there is  nobody else eating the vegetation. That's an open food source and  mammals start going for it, and it's more efficient to be an herbivore  when you're big," says paper co-author Dr. Jessica Theodor, associate  professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of  Calgary.
Theodor says as well as confirming the dramatic growth in mammalian  size after the dinosaurs, the study shows that the ecosystem is able to  reset itself relatively quickly.
"You lose dinosaurs 65 million years ago, and within 25 million  years the system is reset to a new maximum for the animals that are  there in terms of body size. That's actually a pretty short time frame,  geologically speaking," she says. "That's really rapid evolution."
Theodor says mammals grew from a maximum of about 10 kilograms when  they were sharing the earth with dinosaurs to a maximum of 17 tonnes  afterwards.
"Nobody has ever demonstrated that this pattern is really there.  People have talked about it but nobody has ever gone back and done the  math," says Theodor one of the 20 researchers from around the world who  worked on the study. "We went through every time period and said OK, for this group of  mammals what's the biggest one? And then we estimated its body mass."
In order to document how big mammals grew after the 'competitive  release' caused by the extinction of dinosaurs, researchers collected  data on the maximum size for major groups of land mammals on each  continent, including &lt;em&gt;Perissodactyla&lt;/em&gt;, odd-toed ungulates such as horses and rhinos; &lt;em&gt;Proboscidea&lt;/em&gt;, which includes elephants, mammoth and mastodon; &lt;em&gt;Xenarthra&lt;/em&gt;, the anteaters, tree sloths, and armadillos; as well as a number of other extinct groups.
The results give clues as to what sets the limits on mammal size on  land; the amount of space available to each animal and the climate they  live in. The colder the climate, the bigger the mammals seem to get, as  bigger animals conserve heat better. It also shows that no one group of  mammals dominates the largest size class &amp;ndash; the absolute largest mammal  belongs to different groups over time and space.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6170</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:17:43 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>In fending off diseases, plants and animals are much the same, research shows</title><description>It may have been 1 billion years since plants and animals branched  apart on the evolutionary tree but down through the ages they have  developed strikingly similar mechanisms for detecting microbial  invasions and resisting diseases.
This revelation was arrived at over a period of 15 years by teams of  researchers from seemingly disparate fields who have used classical  genetic studies to unravel the mysteries of disease resistance in plants  and animals, according to a historical overview that will appear in the  Nov. 19 issue of the journal &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt;.
The report, written by Pamela Ronald, a UC Davis plant pathologist,  and Bruce Beutler, an immunologist and mammalian geneticist at The  Scripps Research Institute, describes how researchers have used common  approaches to tease apart the secrets of immunity in species ranging  from fruit flies to rice. It also forecasts where future research will  lead.
"Increasingly, researchers will be intent on harnessing knowledge of  host sensors to advance plant and animal health," said Ronald, who was a  co-recipient of the 2008 U.S. Department of Agriculture's National  Research Initiative Discovery Award for work on the genetic basis of  flood tolerance in rice.
"Some of the resistance mechanisms that researchers will discover  will likely serve as new drug targets to control deadly bacteria for  which there are currently no effective treatments," she said.
At the heart of this research saga are receptors -- protein  molecules usually found on cell membranes -- that recognize and bind to  specific molecules on invading organisms, signaling the plant or animal  in which the receptor resides to mount an immune response and fend off  microbial infection and disease.
Beutler and Ronald have played key roles in this chapter of  scientific discovery. In 1995, Ronald identified the first such receptor  -- a rice gene known as known as Xa21 -- and in 1998, Beutler  identified the gene for the first immune receptor in mammals -- a mouse  gene known as TLR4.
Their overview in Science includes illustrated descriptions of the  disease-resistance or immunity pathways in the mouse, Drosophila fruit  fly, rice and a common research plant known as Arabidopsis. These  represent the immune defense systems of vertebrates, insects,  monocotyledons (grass-like plants) and dicotyledons (plants like beans  that have two seed leaves.)
The researchers note that plant biologists led the way in  discovering receptors that sense and respond to infection. The 1980s  brought about an intense hunt for the genes that control production of  the receptor proteins, followed by an "avalanche" of newly discovered  receptor genes and mechanisms in the 1990s.
Another milestone included discovery in 2000 of the immune receptor  in Arabidopsis known as FLS2 -- which demonstrated that a plant receptor  could bind to a molecule that is present in many different microbial  invaders.
The review also discuses how plant and animal immune responses have  evolved through the years and which mechanisms have remained the same.
While the past 15 years have been rich in significant discoveries  related to plant and animal immunity, Beutler and Ronald are quick to  point out that researchers have just scratched the surface.
"If you think of evolution as a tree and existing plant and animal  species as the leaves on the tips of the tree's branches, it is clear  that we have examined only a few of those leaves and have only a  fragmentary impression of what immune mechanisms exist now and were  present in the distant past," said Beutler, an elected member of the  U.S. National Academy of Sciences.
He and Ronald predict that, as results from new gene sequencing  projects become available, scientists will likely find that some plant  and animal species emphasize specific resistance mechanisms while having  little use for others.
For example, the researchers point out that the Drosophila's immune  system depends on only one immunologically active receptor, known as the  Toll receptor, to sense invasion by fungi and gram-positive bacteria.  In contrast, Arabidopsis has dozens of sensors to protect against  microbial infections and rice has hundreds.
Ronald and Beutler project that many surprises will be uncovered by  future research as it probes the disease-resistance mechanisms of other  species.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6119</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:23:25 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>DNA reveals origins of first European farmers</title><description>A team of international researchers led by ancient DNA experts from the University of Adelaide has resolved the longstanding issue of the origins of the people who introduced farming to Europe some 8000 years ago.
A detailed genetic study of one of the first farming communities in  Europe, from central Germany, reveals marked similarities with  populations living in the Ancient Near East (modern-day Turkey, Iraq and  other countries) rather than those from Europe.
Project leader Professor Alan Cooper, Director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD) at the University of Adelaide, says: "This overturns current  thinking, which accepts that the first European farming populations were  constructed largely from existing populations of hunter-gatherers, who  had either rapidly learned to farm or interbred with the invaders."
The results of the study have been published today in the online peer-reviewed science journal &lt;em&gt;PLoS Biology&lt;/em&gt;.
"We have finally resolved the question of who the first farmers in  Europe were &amp;ndash; invaders with revolutionary new ideas, rather than  populations of Stone Age hunter-gatherers who already existed in the  area," says lead author Dr Wolfgang Haak, Senior Research Associate with  ACAD at the University of Adelaide.
"We've been able to apply new, high-precision ancient DNA methods to  create a detailed genetic picture of this ancient farming population,  and reveal that it was radically different to the nomadic populations  already present in Europe.
"We have also been able to use genetic signatures to identify a  potential route from the Near East and Anatolia, where farming evolved  around 11,000 years ago, via south-eastern Europe and the Carpathian  Basin (today's Hungary) into Central Europe," Dr Haak says.
The project involved researchers from the University of Mainz and  State Heritage Museum in Halle, Germany, the Russian Academy of Sciences  and members of the National Geographic Society's Genographic Project,  of which Professor Cooper is a Principal Investigator and Dr Haak is a  Senior Research Associate.
The ancient DNA used in this study comes from a complete graveyard  of Early Neolithic farmers unearthed at the town of Derenburg in  Saxony-Anhalt, central Germany.
"This work was only possible due to the close collaboration of  archaeologists excavating the skeletons, to ensure that no modern human  DNA contaminated the remains, and nicely illustrates the potential when  archaeology and genetics are combined," says Professor Kurt Werner Alt  from the collaborating Institute of Anthropology in Mainz, Germany.</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6046</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:22:14 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Human-specific evolution in battling bugs and building babies</title><description>Although human and chimpanzee immune systems have many identical  components, this is not the case for the family of killer cell  immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) controlling white blood cells known  as natural killer (NK) cells. Published in the open-access journal &lt;em&gt;PloS Genetics&lt;/em&gt; on November 4, a paper by Stanford University researchers describes  qualitative KIR differences, acquired after humans and chimpanzees  separated 6 million years ago and mainly a consequence of innovation in  the human line. These differences open up an exciting avenue for  explaining the differential susceptibility of humans and chimpanzees to  devastating infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS and malaria.
While immunological research has increasingly concentrated on the  inbred laboratory mouse for the last half century, mice actually  represent a poor model for human KIR because their NK cell receptors are  so disparate from the simian primate counterparts. As a result, the  researchers looked at chimpanzee KIR so that they could accurately  compare them with the well-characterized human versions.
NK cells serve in both immune defense and reproduction; they  contribute to early defense against infection and are implicated during  the early phase of pregnancy, when uterine NK cells orchestrate  enlargement of maternal arteries that will supply blood to the placenta  and nourish the fetus. These vital NK cell functions seem subject to  variable and competing selective pressures that have driven rapid KIR  evolution and produced striking differences between humans and  chimpanzees, as closely related as they are. These distinctions derive  from adaptations in the human line in response to selective pressures on  human NK cells due to the competing needs of defense and reproduction.  Whereas chimpanzees have a potent battery of KIR that appears aimed at  fighting infection, the human KIR represent a functional compromise  between battling bugs and building babies.
&amp;nbsp;</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=6022</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 03:34:48 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Forces for cancer spread: Genomic instability and evolutionary selection</title><description>In new research published today, researchers uncover evolution in  action in cancer cells. They show the forces of evolution in pancreatic  tumours mean that not only is cancer genetically different between  different patients, but each new focus of cancer spread within a patient  has acquired distinct mutations.
Effectively, ten different foci of cancer spread are ten different,  but related, tumours. The complexity of pancreatic cancer genetics  uncovered in this work helps to explain the difficulty of treating the  disease but also strengthens the need for improved methods for early  diagnosis
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with only two or three  patients in one hundred living beyond five years from first diagnosis.  The spread &amp;ndash; metastasis &amp;ndash; of the tumour is thought to be relatively  symptomless in most patients until the disease is advanced.
"We have always known that pancreatic cancer is a particularly  aggressive disease," says Dr Peter Campbell, from the Wellcome Trust  Sanger Institute and first author on the paper.  "This study illustrates  why it is so challenging. Each metastasis is its own tumour, each  evolving, each striving for dominance, each adapting to life outside the  pancreas. When we treat cancer that has spread through the body, we're  not just treating one tumour, we might be treating tens of genetically  distinct tumours."
The researchers, from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, near  Cambridge, UK and the Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center at  Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, USA, looked at cancers in  13 patients who died from pancreatic cancer. They mapped rearrangements  in the genomes of cancer samples: in some cases, they looked at several  metastases from a patient.
They discovered that pancreatic cancer genomes often contain a  distinctive pattern of genome rearrangement that possibly reflects  changes to repair mechanisms in the cancer cells. The pattern of  mutation events is dramatically different to that found in breast  cancer, for example.
"With each study, cancer genomes are being revealed in their  intricate complex detail," says Dr Andy Futreal, Head of Cancer Genetics  and Genomics at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and a senior author  on the paper. "Genome instability is common in cancer, but this study  has further revealed the dynamic nature of that instability and its role  in spread of disease in the patient &amp;ndash; with instability being an engine  of selection that allows the tumour to adapt to new sites in the body.
"We can see a root of common lesions &amp;ndash; about half of the mutations  are shared across metastases. Metastatic cancer is therefore like a  family: the different deposits of tumour are genetically related to one  another, as brothers, sisters and cousins are, but also have  distinguishing genetic features that make them individual. Identifying  and targeting the shared mutations with drugs is likely to be a route to  more effective treatment."
In a companion study Dr Iacobuzio-Donahue and her colleagues show  that single-letter mutations show a similarly complex pattern. The team  on that paper suggest that there might be a long time lag from the first  cancer-causing mutations in the primary tumour to the violent and rapid  metastasis of late-stage disease.
Both papers suggest that the galloping mutation rate that develops  produces cells that, because of specific mutations they acquire, can  colonize other organs. Different combinations of active genes are needed  to survive in different tissues. This is a return to the 120-year-old  seed and soil hypothesis that some organs provide particularly fertile  ground for particular cancer cells to grow. This work shows that even in  one person's cancer, clones of cells can evolve genomes specialised for  life in defined organs.
The researchers emphasize that the shared mutations common to many  early-stage pancreatic cancers could provide a route to discovery of new  drug targets. In addition, the long time between the initial genetic  changes in the developing primary cancer and spread to other organs  might offer a window in which early diagnosis could detect disease while  it is still curable by surgery.
The patients for these studies were recruited to a programme  established by Dr Iacobuzio-Donahue in Baltimore to develop new  understanding of this difficult tumour type. Patients with terminal  pancreatic cancer discuss with the team the aims of the research and  choose whether or not to provide samples after their death.
"We are so grateful to all patients who have discussed this  programme," explains Dr Iacobuzio-Donahue from the Sol Goldman  Pancreatic Cancer Research Center at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions,  Baltimore, Maryland and a senior author on the paper. "In times of  tremendous personal difficulty, they and their families and friends have  taken steps to help others, with the hope we can improve diagnosis and  treatments in the future. The sacrifices they have made are now  fundamentally improving our understanding of how pancreatic cancer  develops and spreads.
"This is a research paper, but we are all of us aware that there are real people behind these samples."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=5954</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:34:39 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>60 Utahns are among landmark large-scale genome sequencing study</title><description>Just seven months after University of Utah geneticists took part in a  landmark study that sequenced for the first time the genome of an  entire Utah family, U of U researchers have taken part in another  historic study that is the first large-scale genome sequencing project &amp;ndash;  179 people representing three continents &amp;ndash; and 60 Utahns played a major  role in this study, too.
Published Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2010, in &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;, the study  demonstrates how quickly the science of genome sequencing is expanding &amp;ndash;  first from individuals, then to families, and now to large groups of  people representing distinct geographic and ethnic populations,  according to Lynn B. Jorde, Ph.D., professor and chair of human genetics  in the U of U School of Medicine and a senior investigator and  co-author on the study. Rapid-fire technological advances and highly  sophisticated computers are giving geneticists the ability to sequence  the genomes of increasingly larger groups of people at lower costs, and  this study is an example of the research that breakthroughs in  technology enable. It highlights as well the significant role Utahns  have played in groundbreaking genetics studies.
"This study provides the first large-scale inventory of human  genetic diversity," Jorde said. "It also is a good example of how Utahns  have helped researchers worldwide. Genetics studies keep coming back to  Utah."
The study is part of the 1000 Genomes Project Consortium &amp;ndash; an  international collaboration of hundreds of geneticists from dozens of  laboratories with the goals of cataloging the range of genetic diversity  found in people worldwide and characterizing 95 percent of the most  common genetic mutations found in humans. Along with being the first  large-scale genome-sequencing project, the study made several important  findings, including confirmation of earlier work of Jorde's lab group  and scientists at the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle that gave  the first direct estimate of the rate of genetic mutation in humans;  providing evidence of recent natural selection in new genes; discovering  a number of genetic mutations that occur often enough to be considered  among the most common in humans; and identifying new "mobile elements" &amp;ndash;  DNA sequences that randomly reshuffle in the genome.
Earlier this year, Jorde, who is on the 1000 Genomes Project  steering committee, was part of the team that was the first to sequence  the genome of an entire family &amp;ndash; two parents and two children who live  in Utah. As part of that study, published in March in Science, he  estimated the rate at which genetic mutations are passed from generation  to generation at 60 &amp;ndash; meaning each parent passes 30 genetic mutations  to their offspring. Most gene mutations are harmless, but understanding  the rate at which mutations are passed among generations is an essential  part of understanding the human biological clock, according to Jorde.  To confirm his estimated mutation rate, which was half of what had been  estimated previously by indirect methods, researchers in the current  study sequenced the genomes of two families of three people each.
"We were delighted that the mutation rate estimate obtained from the  1000 Genomes Project was exactly the same as our estimate," Jorde said.
In the large-scale sequencing phase of the project &amp;ndash; in which the  genomes of 60 Utahns representing Northern Europe; 60 Nigerians  representing Africa; and 30 Chinese and 30 Japanese people representing  Southeast Asia were sequenced &amp;ndash; the researchers identified a number of  new genes that appear to have undergone recent natural selection. That  mirrors another study from Jorde's lab, published in Science in July of  this year, that showed evidence of genetic natural selection within the  past 5,000 to 10,000 years that enables the people of Tibet to thrive in  the low-oxygen environment of extremely high altitudes. Finding further  proof of natural selection in a broader diversity of people in the  current study provides evidence to answer another basic question about  humans: are we still evolving?
"These studies provide an unequivocal answer &amp;ndash; yes," Jorde said.
The 60 Utahns in the project were part of a number of families who  30 years ago volunteered for a U of U study investigating how genetic  variations are passed in families.
As they sequenced the genomes of those three population groups, the  researchers also discovered a number of genetic mutations that occur  often enough &amp;ndash; defined as being found in greater than 1 percent of  people &amp;ndash; to be considered common gene mutations. With the discovery of  these new gene mutations, more than 15 million DNA variations have been  identified in the human genome and the researchers believe the 1000  Genomes Project has reached its goal of identifying 95 percent of common  genetic mutations.  That's a major step that provides a reference of  genetic variation for researchers worldwide trying to unravel the  genetic bases of countless diseases, according to Jorde.
"People now have a catalog for comparing their research results," he  said. "Our ultimate goal is to use this information to understand the  causes of disease."
In a third phase of the study, researchers including Jin chuan Xing,  Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in Jorde's lab, looked at the DNA of 697  people and discovered new "mobile elements" &amp;ndash; DNA sequences that pop up  randomly in peoples' genomes. Although the function of mobile elements  is unknown, they comprise half the human genome and are believed to help  propel evolution. This was the first study to look at mobile elements  in a large population of people, Xing said.
"We discovered a lot of new ones," he said. "This will help us look at how mobile elements assemble."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=5951</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:30:28 PDT</pubDate></item><item><title>World's vertebrates face increasing risk of extinction</title><description>A new assessment conducted by 174 scientists from around the world  underscores a growing concern about the health of the world's  biodiversity, quantifying the rate of decline among vertebrate species  on a global scale for the first time. The team's results support the  idea that our planet is currently experiencing its sixth mass  extinction&amp;mdash;nearly one fifth of all known vertebrate species are  currently classified as Threatened on the International Union for the  Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, and an average of 52 species of  mammals, birds, and amphibians move one category closer to extinction  each year. The team, which includes California Academy of Sciences  mammalogist Dr. Galen Rathbun, notes that over the past four decades,  species extinction rates have exceeded normal background rates by two to  three orders of magnitude. However, the team reports that species  losses and declines would have been 20% worse in the absence of  conservation efforts to protect threatened species. Thus, while current  conservation efforts remain insufficient to offset the main drivers of  biodiversity loss&amp;mdash;including habitat loss, over-exploitation, and  invasive alien species&amp;mdash;targeted conservation efforts have had a  measurable positive impact on the planet's vertebrate species. The  research is reported in the October 26 issue of &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt; Express, the website for the journal &lt;em&gt;Science&lt;/em&gt; (publication in the print version of Science will follow at a later date).
The study used data for 25,000 species from The IUCN Red List of  Threatened Species&amp;trade;  to investigate the status of the world's  vertebrates (mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and fishes) and how  this status has changed over time. Their results indicate that  approximately 20% of the worlds vertebrates are currently classified as  Threatened (assigned the IUCN Red List status of Critically Endangered,  Endangered, or Vulnerable), including 25% of all mammals, 13% of birds,  22% of reptiles, 41% of amphibians, 33% of cartilaginous fishes, and 15%  of bony fishes. While vertebrates comprise just 3% of the known species  on Earth, they play vital roles in their ecosystems and have great  cultural and economic significance for humans. The new report  demonstrates that these species continue to decline at an alarming rate,  particularly in tropical areas. Global patterns of rising extinction  risk are most marked in Southeast Asia, where agricultural expansion,  logging, and hunting are the primary forces behind accelerating  extinction rates.
California Academy of Sciences mammalogist Dr. Galen Rathbun  contributed data to the report on the status of the members of the  Afrotheria supercohort, an ancient group of African mammals that  includes elephants, sea cows, hyraxes, sengis (also known as  elephant-shrews), tenrecs, golden moles and aardvarks. Of the 83 species  currently recognized in this supercohort, 30 are considered Threatened,  and an additional eight species are considered data deficient&amp;mdash;these  species are quite possibly threatened, but scientists don't know enough  about their distribution to be able to assign them a status. Therefore,  somewhere between 36% and 46% of the world's Afrotheria species are  currently threatened with extinction.
The Afrotheria supercohort represents one of the world's major  mammalian evolutionary radiations. By one count, the seven groups that  make up the Afrotheria represent nearly a third of all the living orders  of mammals. However, the number of species within this supercohort is  relatively low, totaling only about 1.5% of the world's mammals. This  means that with relatively few species extinctions, entire groups of  afrotherian mammals would cease to exist, thus terminating over 100  million years of evolution in Africa and drastically reducing that  region's biodiversity.
"Almost any loss within the Afrotheria supercohort would be profound  in terms of its evolutionary significance, because the members of this  group carry such unique genes," says Rathbun. "Like many other groups,  the afrotherian mammals are threatened predominantly by habitat loss and  habitat degradation. For instance, all four of the forest-dwelling  sengis are threatened with extinction, because the forests in Africa are  rapidly disappearing."
While habitat loss and degradation are the primary drivers of rising  extinction rates around the world, they are not the only culprits. The  study authors noted several new threats that have emerged in recent  years, including the use of a veterinary drug called diclofenac, an  anti-inflammatory drug similar to ibuprofen that was introduced to the  veterinary market on the Indian subcontinent in the early 1990s. While  cattle can tolerate high doses of the drug, it soon became apparent that  Asian vultures cannot&amp;mdash;shortly after feeding on dead livestock treated  with diclofenac, the birds die from renal failure. Since 1992, the  population of Oriental White-backed Vultures has declined by more than  99%.
Based on the current trends, scientists estimate that the Oriental  White-backed Vulture will be extinct in the wild in less than a decade.  The only hope for the bird's survival is to establish an aggressive  captive breeding program, which would enable scientists to reintroduce  vultures to the wild once diclofenac is no longer in use. California  Academy of Sciences ornithologist Dr. David Mindell has been studying  genetic diversity in current and historical Oriental White-backed  Vulture populations to help guide these captive breeding efforts and  assess species status of the bird's closest relatives. His research has  provided a clear course of action for ensuring that this species  survives with a healthy, diverse gene pool.
Captive breeding programs are just one of the conservation strategies  that are helping to mitigate species extinctions. The study authors  also found evidence of notable conservation successes through  legislation to limit hunting, establishment of new protected areas, and  efforts to remove invasive alien species.
"The stark reality of accelerating species losses can lead to a  feeling of hopelessness," says Mindell, Dean of Science at the  California Academy of Sciences. "However, the IUCN data analyzed in this  assessment show that concerted efforts by biologists and  conservationists can make a positive difference in slowing rates of  endangerment.  Hopefully, these findings will bolster existing efforts  at conservation&amp;mdash;and spawn new initiatives as well."</description><link>http://www.labslink.com/ViewResearchNews.aspx?id=5944</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:31:27 PDT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>